And Then There;'s These Scumbags

22 Mar 2020 09:43 #21 by koobookie

Pony Soldier wrote: You forgot the part about her shuttering her business and never made a dime off of those patents...don't you ever get tired of it? Being lied to by your beloved media day in and day out?


What happens when she gets out of the WH and restarts her business with all those patents? Think she'll make a dime then?

The point that you are obviously dodging is that she, and the boys as well, are using their father's coattails to further their businesses, and thus, line their pockets. That's exactly what you are accusing Hunter Biden of doing.

Don't you get tired of trying to defend Donald?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

22 Mar 2020 11:00 - 22 Mar 2020 16:33 #22 by Rick

koobookie wrote: The point that you are obviously dodging is that she, and the boys as well, are using their father's coattails to further their businesses, and thus, line their pockets. That's exactly what you are accusing Hunter Biden of doing.


You conveniently forget inconvenient facts. Hunter didn't use his fathers influence to further a family business, the Ukrainians paid him so that they could use his father's influence. Joe also had a real quid pro quo where he threatened to withhold a billion in military aid if a prosecutor wasn't fired.... a prosecutor who just happened to be investigating Burismo who was paying Hunter a million a year to do nothing. If you don't think Trump would have been fried by the media for doing that with his son then ****** ***** ** ******** or ****** *** **** *****.

The left is angry because they are now being judged by the content of their character and not by the color of their skin.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

22 Mar 2020 11:54 #23 by koobookie

Rick wrote:

koobookie wrote: The point that you are obviously dodging is that she, and the boys as well, are using their father's coattails to further their businesses, and thus, line their pockets. That's exactly what you are accusing Hunter Biden of doing.


You conveniently forget inconvenient facts. Hunter didn't use his fathers influence to further a family business, the Ukrainians paid him so that they could use his father's influence. Joe also had a real quid pro quo where he threatened to withhold a billion in military aid if a prosecutor wasn't fired.... a prosecutor who just happened to be investigating Burismo who was paying Hunter a million a year to do nothing. If you don't think Trump would have been fried by the media for doing that with his son then you're lying to yourself or you're not very bright.


I know that is the way you see the Ukraine scandal, but it's incorrect. It's been posted here many times the actual facts - you just choose to not see them.

You think Ivanka didn't use her father's position to further her career as a designer? You think the boys aren't using their father's office to accelerate their business? I guess you're not very bright.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

22 Mar 2020 13:27 - 22 Mar 2020 13:34 #24 by FredHayek

koobookie wrote:

Rick wrote:

koobookie wrote: The point that you are obviously dodging is that she, and the boys as well, are using their father's coattails to further their businesses, and thus, line their pockets. That's exactly what you are accusing Hunter Biden of doing.


You conveniently forget inconvenient facts. Hunter didn't use his fathers influence to further a family business, the Ukrainians paid him so that they could use his father's influence. Joe also had a real quid pro quo where he threatened to withhold a billion in military aid if a prosecutor wasn't fired.... a prosecutor who just happened to be investigating Burismo who was paying Hunter a million a year to do nothing. If you don't think Trump would have been fried by the media for doing that with his son then you're lying to yourself or you're not very bright.


I know that is the way you see the Ukraine scandal, but it's incorrect. It's been posted here many times the actual facts - you just choose to not see them.

You think Ivanka didn't use her father's position to further her career as a designer? You think the boys aren't using their father's office to accelerate their business? I guess you're not very bright.


K,
Both parties are corrupt. But you will only call out the Republicans? Ok, be that way.
The Bush Foundation traded "charity" donations for aid. The Clinton Foundation learned that from the Bush's. Biden's son Hunter got jobs in both China and the Ukraine he had no business getting.

And Senator Biden openly condemned President Trump shutting down the flights between China and the US. Do you think Hunter or the Chinese asked him to condemn the actions of the President?
Hillary Clinton also attacked Trump's air blockade. How many more Americans would have been infected if Hillary had won? Thousands? Tens of thousands?

Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

22 Mar 2020 14:35 - 22 Mar 2020 14:39 #25 by koobookie

FredHayek wrote: Both parties are corrupt. But you will only call out the Republicans? Ok, be that way.
The Bush Foundation traded "charity" donations for aid. The Clinton Foundation learned that from the Bush's. Biden's son Hunter got jobs in both China and the Ukraine he had no business getting.

What Hunter did was unethical, but not illegal. I hate that he cashed in on his dad's position in the government. What the Trump kids is also unethical profiting off the office of the President. It's yet to be seen if it's illegal.

FredHayek wrote: And Senator Biden openly condemned President Trump shutting down the flights between China and the US. Do you think Hunter or the Chinese asked him to condemn the actions of the President?
Hillary Clinton also attacked Trump's air blockade. How many more Americans would have been infected if Hillary had won? Thousands? Tens of thousands?

Both Hillary and Joe are private citizens. Is it not their right to criticize the President?

I am quite sure that if Hillary were in the oval office, our country would have been prepared for this pandemic, and thousands - nay, tens of thousands - would not die due to incompetence of Trump.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

22 Mar 2020 16:39 - 22 Mar 2020 16:40 #26 by ScienceChic
Lachlan Markay @lachlan March 20, 2020

So there was a flurry of reports last night based on cursory reviews of senators who, it appeared, may have engaged in suspect stock transactions similar to Burr and Loeffler. I don't think the ones that I've seen hold up. I'll take them one by one
James Inhofe
David Perdue
Ron Johnson
Dianne Feinstein

See Twitter thread for details.

From Feinstein herself:

Sen. Dianne Feinstein’s Husband Sold a Biotech Stock Near Its 2020 Low
By Ed Lin, Barron's | March 1, 2020 7:15 am ET

Sen. Dianne Feinstein disclosed that her husband, Richard C. Blum, sold a biotech stock in January, when it was trading near its 2020 intraday lows.


"Now, more than ever, the illusions of division threaten our very existence. We all know the truth: more connects us than separates us. But in times of crisis the wise build bridges, while the foolish build barriers. We must find a way to look after one another as if we were one single tribe.” -King T'Challa, Black Panther

The truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it. ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is. ~Winston Churchill
Attachments:

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

23 Mar 2020 05:41 - 23 Mar 2020 05:43 #27 by HEARTLESS
Whether Nasty Nancy had knowledge of this or not, it is just a pimple on her vast a$$ of crimes.

The silent majority will be silent no more.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

23 Mar 2020 06:55 - 23 Mar 2020 06:57 #28 by ramage
The Barron's article states the Blum bought the stock for approx. $18, sold at $21.25. A profit of 18% in one year. It was NOT a loss as the poster alleges in her twitter account.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

23 Mar 2020 12:04 - 23 Mar 2020 12:05 #29 by ScienceChic
Wrong, it did not. It said that shares of Allogene went public in October 2018 at $18/share and that

Blum didn’t own any Allogene stock at the end of 2018, according to regulatory records. The company went public that October, priced at $18 a share. We reported that Blum purchased $500,001 to $1 million of Allogene stock in May 2019.

It also said, and provided a link, to the report that Blum purchased his stock May 13, 2019 when shares closed at $29.82.

Source

Hence, her claim was correct that he sold at a loss.

Besides the point, Dianne Feinstein has her stock all in a blind trust and didn't attend the coronavirus briefing that the other representatives did so she was falsely accused of insider trading.

Now if only our president actually operated in such an ethical fashion as to put his businesses in a blind trust...

"Now, more than ever, the illusions of division threaten our very existence. We all know the truth: more connects us than separates us. But in times of crisis the wise build bridges, while the foolish build barriers. We must find a way to look after one another as if we were one single tribe.” -King T'Challa, Black Panther

The truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it. ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is. ~Winston Churchill
Attachments:

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

24 Mar 2020 06:49 #30 by homeagain
OH MY, was that fake news that a poster pawned off as TRUTH? (the other side of the left....
who believes all things Trump)

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.213 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum
sponsors
© My Mountain Town (new)
Google+