Pelosi is scum

Why does she want to tank the economy? She’s screwing over every American, not just Republicans. You libs need to get control of your “leaders” before this country is done for.

Pony Soldier wrote: Why does she want to tank the economy? She’s screwing over every American, not just Republicans. You libs need to get control of your “leaders” before this country is done for.

sorry BUCKO.....IT IS ALREADY DONE.....he opens the gates prematurely,it becomes a bust
and if he stays the course it will hurt.....the ONLY difference is the DEATH OF THOUSANDS OF
PEOPLE when he opens the gates....we already KNOW what needs to be done to flat the curve,BUT,the king, in all his wisdom believes his "hunch" is better....THAT and he can't stand
to see the markets BELOW the level of when he took office....THAT is the real reason for his
inane decision to initiate opening the gates......a horror of a human being... MY legacy BEFORE
your life....what a gem of a gentlemen.

covidactnow.org/

ThIS is a graphic of what WILL OCCUR....click on Colorado state to view your kings questionable actions......OFF THE CHARTS....

and how many thousands will die if he allows your "wise older woman" to continue holding the economy hostage for solar panels and emissions standards for airlines that are going bankrupt? You don't think there will be civil unrest if 1/3 of people lose their jobs? It will be a free for all.

Nancy is not taking this pandemic seriously. She thinks she can slip a thousand page plus piece of legislation through before everyone can read it. Well, this time, 80 million people are sitting unemployed worrying if they will be homeless next month. They have time to read her latest attempt to take advantage of a crisis. Even the leftist press is going after her power grab.

Pony Soldier wrote: and how many thousands will die if he allows your "wise older woman" to continue holding the economy hostage for solar panels and emissions standards for airlines that are going bankrupt? You don't think there will be civil unrest if 1/3 of people lose their jobs? It will be a free for all.

She ignored the topic completely, as usual. Pelosi can't help herself, she can't let a crisis go to waste, and she obviously doesn't care about the people harmed by her BS. Are there really people out there who give two shits about global warming right now? If our economy crashes into a depression many of us will be burning our furniture to keep warm next winter.... oh, but maybe the all mighty government will give us all solar panels. FKN lunatics.

Mitch and his gang wrote the bill without Democratic input. Now they are complaining that the Dems don't just roll over and approve it? That's not how Congress works.

Over two trillion in the bill, with half a trillion in a slush fund that has no accountability for six months? I thought conservatives viewed big government as the problem, not the solution. When asked who would oversee the $500 billion slush fund, Trump answered "I will." You trust him not to send a bunch of that to MaraLago or his other properties or to his kids or to campaign contributors?

Bullshit. It was a bipartisan bill negotiated over the course of a week and sunk by Pelosi at the 11th hour because she realized that 5 Republican senators were quarantined and could not vote. She, and I repeat, is scum.

Pony Soldier wrote: Bullshit. It was a bipartisan bill negotiated over the course of a week and sunk by Pelosi at the 11th hour because she realized that 5 Republican senators were quarantined and could not vote. She, and I repeat, is scum.

Looks like Pelosi's daughter is also exhibiting her own scambaggery by tweeting that "Rand Paul's neighbor was right" as Paul is currently infected with Covid-19. Keepin it classy.

koobookie wrote: Mitch and his gang wrote the bill without Democratic input. Now they are complaining that the Dems don't just roll over and approve it? That's not how Congress works.

Over two trillion in the bill, with half a trillion in a slush fund that has no accountability for six months? I thought conservatives viewed big government as the problem, not the solution. When asked who would oversee the $500 billion slush fund, Trump answered "I will." You trust him not to send a bunch of that to MaraLago or his other properties or to his kids or to campaign contributors?

The new Democrat talking point is the "slush fund", but it is better to call it rapid reaction assets. We don't necessarily know where this money will be needed in the coming months. It is a good idea to have an account that isn't designated. Some people call it a rainy day fund. And I agree that it could be horribly mismanaged, politicians have a long record of doing that. Remember when Governor Hickenlooper got caught for misusing 9/11 funding?
Hopefully this time it will go where it is most needed.

Sadly I think these spending bills of 2 trillion are just the start. The stock market lost 11 trillion dollars last time I looked. 40% unemployment rate is possible. I just saw scuttlebutt today that CDOT has sent the people who plow roads and service the plows home and they might not come back for the next Spring storm. (I hope this is untrue.)

koobookie wrote: Mitch and his gang wrote the bill without Democratic input. Now they are complaining that the Dems don't just roll over and approve it? That's not how Congress works.

Over two trillion in the bill, with half a trillion in a slush fund that has no accountability for six months? I thought conservatives viewed big government as the problem, not the solution. When asked who would oversee the $500 billion slush fund, Trump answered "I will." You trust him not to send a bunch of that to MaraLago or his other properties or to his kids or to campaign contributors?

What do you think about all the garbage included in the bill that has nothing to do with this crisis?