ramage wrote: As I pointed out in a different thread, the evidence will be presented in court. The court of public opinion, i.e. the MSM does not count. ( If it did Hunter Biden would be the loving father as portrayed on the Biden website, absent his child in Arkansas that he fought to deny support payments for, instead of a deadbeat out-of-wedlock father, but that is an aside. )
The court is where the evidence will be shown, plain and simple. Why would the democrat governors of Michigan and Pennsylvania, et. al., oppose transparency?
How are the governors of Michigan and Pennsylvania, et. al., opposing transparency? It is my understanding that there were poll watchers during the voting and the counting. Have those states denied access to both parties during the process?
ramage wrote: As I pointed out in a different thread, the evidence will be presented in court. The court of public opinion, i.e. the MSM does not count. ( If it did Hunter Biden would be the loving father as portrayed on the Biden website, absent his child in Arkansas that he fought to deny support payments for, instead of a deadbeat out-of-wedlock father, but that is an aside. )
The court is where the evidence will be shown, plain and simple. Why would the democrat governors of Michigan and Pennsylvania, et. al., oppose transparency?
How are the governors of Michigan and Pennsylvania, et. al., opposing transparency? It is my understanding that there were poll watchers during the voting and the counting. Have those states denied access to both parties during the process?
There is so much misinformation going around but I have read one story where Republican poll watchers were banned from some Philadelphia voting precincts. I have also read stories that Republican poll watchers were banned from some precincts because they refused to wear masks and were unruly.
I would like to see more media cover this story.
Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.
