homeagain wrote: BECAUSE there were troops there previously and it did not matter....the integrity/alliance of the men in the troops was a problem... (traitors), lesson learned...OTHER safety measures needed.
I have the same question as Pony Soldier, where is the proof?
You've dodged my question about the fence several times now so I guess I'll have to give you the correct answer. The fence is there because it is an effective deterrent. I could go to DC with some good wire cutters and get through the fence but it would take some time. The time it takes me to get through would be enough for the troops to catch me. This is just common sense and everybody with active brain cells knows this to be true (except Biden of course).
So a relatively short fence made out of wire is an effective deterrent, but a very tall steel wall/fence at the border is no deterrent at all. If the Harris administration doesn't believe in the effectiveness of walls and fences, they should set an example and take their fence down, TODAY.
The left is angry because they are now being judged by the content of their character and not by the color of their skin.
It's not really a concern to me. I'm sorry the Jan. 6 right-wing insurrectionists did what they did. If the fence had been up then, maybe it could have been prevented.
