Did U notice I had posted a feel good story not too long ago? (in fact I have attempted to make an effort to post several,the result?) FEW VIEWS, no comments....the adage "if it bleeds,it leads" is SO TRUE.
homeagain wrote: Did U notice I had posted a feel good story not too long ago? (in fact I have attempted to make an effort to post several,the result?) FEW VIEWS, no comments....the adage "if it bleeds,it leads" is SO TRUE.
That's nice that you posted a nice story, but that has nothing to do with my topic. I think the media is mostly the enemy of the people at this point and if I decide to vent by posting horrible headlines that prove that, I'm pretty sure I still have the right to do that here.
You are not required to respond to anything I post, but if you decide to, it would be nice if you at least post your opinion about it and not take it into your own direction. I always try to do that when I respond to your posts, but I would welcome you to point it out if I don't.
The left is angry because they are now being judged by the content of their character and not by the color of their skin.
homeagain wrote: YOUR topic is OVER exposed,so I countered with an UNDER exposed response......the world is fubared,
so your ATTEMPT at being relevant is really inane.
I did not think it was inane and you are being very judgmental of the poster. SHAME SHAME.
homeagain wrote: YOUR topic is OVER exposed,so I countered with an UNDER exposed response......the world is fubared,
so your ATTEMPT at being relevant is really inane.
Hmm, I'm having a little trouble deciphering that one but I'll try.
1. My topic is "over exposed"
Are you talking about bad headlines or are you talking about violence against Jews being a "gift" to Republicans?
exposed:
not covered or hidden; visible.
So you're saying that one of those is too visible and should not be? I don't get it.
2. "the world is fubared"
So are you saying that the world is in such bad shape that we may as well just give up and not talk about what bothers us in the media?
3."Your ATTEMPT at being relevant is really inane"
Why is pointing out media strategies that are made to divide us not relevant to what is happening in the world you say is fubared? Makes no sense.
in·ane
adjective
silly; stupid.
Why is the point I'm making silly or stupid? If I was hypersensitive I could report that as an attack on me personally, but I'm not. I only hope that one day you'll just converse with me in a way that people used to, by simply addressing my point if you have an opinion that directly relates to it. Instead I get:
Your topic has seen too much light in a F####D up world so it's not relevant and your point is stupid.
The left is angry because they are now being judged by the content of their character and not by the color of their skin.
Rick,
I propose that you be the official interpreter of MMT. I was unable to make any sense of the post that you are addressing. I lost any understanding with the "UNDER exposed response." segment.
Your translation makes sense:
"Your topic has seen too much light in a F####D up world so it's not relevant and your point is stupid."