Texas Abortion Laws V. Supreme Court?

Will the Supreme Court spike the new rules restricting abortion rights? Put a temporary hold on them until an official case reaches them in their next term? Could have major ramifications on the 2022 midterms is allowed to become law.

REMEMBER K? "I don't think that RVW was correctly decided"......but it is set precedence. (paraphrased)

Totally horrible logic was used on that decision, right to privacy guarantees abortion rights? Nonsense. It does appear an abortion case is already on the docket in the new term.

Will this new law force liberals to leave Texas, making it a deeper red state? Or will the state's Democrat Party become more powerful due to more donations from other states?

Why would someone leave a state because of abortion laws ? People leave when they want more opportunities or more freedom, or to be able to keep more of their money. If someone is leaving because one day they may not be able to kill their unborn child, their priorities are all screwed up and should head straight to CA or another failing liberal state.

Supreme Court upholds the Texas law 5-4. Roberts voted with the three liberals.

Roberts voted with the minority even though he stated that he agreed with the majority on the basis by which they voted. That is, the majority opinion that there was no injured person rather a hypothetical in the presentation to overturn the Texas ban. And until there is a plaintiff with standing the law will remain in effect.
Begs the question, why did he vote the way he did? Was he signaling that he will probably vote with the majority when an acceptable case is brought before the court? Did he want to keep the vote close so as to avoid protests?

He voted that way because he is not a man of principle and is not worthy of his position.

homeagain wrote: REMEMBER K? "I don't think that RVW was correctly decided"......but it is set precedence. (paraphrased)

www.rollingstone.com/politics/political-...g-they-need-1219585/

''K'' just did what he said he would NOT do,because of set precedence. AND U THOUGHT HE WOULD UPHOLD HIS WORD????

www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2021/s...an-law-supreme-court


SONIA calls out the shit show ......but,of course she is FEMALE.