egregious journalistic errors in modern history

16 Nov 2021 07:59 #11 by Rick
What's the topic again? Oh ya, it's about bad journalism.

The left is angry because they are now being judged by the content of their character and not by the color of their skin.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

16 Nov 2021 08:50 #12 by homeagain

Rick wrote: What's the topic again? Oh ya, it's about bad journalism.



BAD journalism has been in existence since I can remember.....JFK's famous libido was NEVER exposed,because the press's acquiescence to his charm/and his father.....it has just become MORE
VITRIOL,OBSCENE AND OBVIOUS. Hillary's fubar with BENGHAZI was really never explored and
the ONLY source that could give a somewhat clear and detailed account was the WSJ......the "art" of
actually reporting has been degrading for a VERY LONG TIME....what is your point?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

16 Nov 2021 18:00 #13 by Rick

homeagain wrote:

Rick wrote: What's the topic again? Oh ya, it's about bad journalism.



BAD journalism has been in existence since I can remember.....JFK's famous libido was NEVER exposed,because the press's acquiescence to his charm/and his father.....it has just become MORE
VITRIOL,OBSCENE AND OBVIOUS. Hillary's fubar with BENGHAZI was really never explored and
the ONLY source that could give a somewhat clear and detailed account was the WSJ......the "art" of
actually reporting has been degrading for a VERY LONG TIME....what is your point?

I've been trying to make this point for years. If we the people only have the media as a watchdog over the people who make decisions that effect our lives, isn't that job even more important than the presidency?

If you study history, you'll find that authoritarianism IS NOT POSSIBLE without the press being in bed with the ruling class. That's why you are so wrong about Trump being a king... he didn't even have the backing of his whole party and certainly not 90% of the press and social media. Contrast that to any Democrat who has the cover of the media and 98% of the party.

If Trump did any of the things Hillary and her campaign did, I would have been all for impeachment. If Trump had a secret server with classified info on it, he would be impeached. If he deleted 33k emails (evidence) and made sure even the FBI couldn't recover any of it, he would have been impeached.

I don't know how many instances of hypocrisy it will take to convince you that there are rarely any consequences for Democrats, but there has to be a point where you eventually see it. At ;east you are honest enough to admit Hillary got a pass, but most on your side still act like she did nothing wrong.

The left is angry because they are now being judged by the content of their character and not by the color of their skin.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

17 Nov 2021 06:24 #14 by homeagain

Rick wrote:

homeagain wrote:

Rick wrote: What's the topic again? Oh ya, it's about bad journalism.



BAD journalism has been in existence since I can remember.....JFK's famous libido was NEVER exposed,because the press's acquiescence to his charm/and his father.....it has just become MORE
VITRIOL,OBSCENE AND OBVIOUS. Hillary's fubar with BENGHAZI was really never explored and
the ONLY source that could give a somewhat clear and detailed account was the WSJ......the "art" of
actually reporting has been degrading for a VERY LONG TIME....what is your point?

I've been trying to make this point for years. If we the people only have the media as a watchdog over the people who make decisions that effect our lives, isn't that job even more important than the presidency?

If you study history, you'll find that authoritarianism IS NOT POSSIBLE without the press being in bed with the ruling class. That's why you are so wrong about Trump being a king... he didn't even have the backing of his whole party and certainly not 90% of the press and social media. Contrast that to any Democrat who has the cover of the media and 98% of the party.

If Trump did any of the things Hillary and her campaign did, I would have been all for impeachment. If Trump had a secret server with classified info on it, he would be impeached. If he deleted 33k emails (evidence) and made sure even the FBI couldn't recover any of it, he would have been impeached.

I don't know how many instances of hypocrisy it will take to convince you that there are rarely any consequences for Democrats, but there has to be a point where you eventually see it. At ;east you are honest enough to admit Hillary got a pass, but most on your side still act like she did nothing wrong.


Bolded....there is a difference between acting and thinking u r king....AND ACTUALLY BEING ONE.TRUMP
MADE THE MISTAKE OF THINKING HE WAS ON THE THRONE,BUT REALITY READS DIFFERENTLY.
(i,ALONE CAN FIX IT)......IS NOT A REALITY BASED STATEMENT.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

17 Nov 2021 08:05 #15 by Rick
How is that anything different from Biden and his record number of executive orders? You don't like Trump's personality, I get it. The accomplishments he had were the very thing his voters (like me) wanted him to do.

What has Biden done so far that you wanted him to do, other than to beat Trump?

The left is angry because they are now being judged by the content of their character and not by the color of their skin.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

18 Nov 2021 11:40 - 18 Nov 2021 11:42 #16 by FredHayek
More bad journalism: MSNBC reporter was caught last night following the jury bus in an attempt to dox the members of the Rittenhouse trial. The judge has now banned MSNBC from the courtroom. The threat of being doxxed could influence jury tallies.

Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

18 Nov 2021 12:21 #17 by Rick

FredHayek wrote: More bad journalism: MSNBC reporter was caught last night following the jury bus in an attempt to dox the members of the Rittenhouse trial. The judge has now banned MSNBC from the courtroom. The threat of being doxxed could influence jury tallies.

If this is true, MSNBC needs to pay a serious price. Intimidating jurors and identifying jurors goes against everything our justice system stands for. Even the judge has gotten death threats, so these scumbags are creating a big incentive for jurors to just convict in order to save themselves and their families from the brain dead mob.

The left is angry because they are now being judged by the content of their character and not by the color of their skin.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.135 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum
sponsors
© My Mountain Town (new)
Google+