FredHayek wrote: Stepmother Jill supports Hunter on his first day in court.
(Supposedly they really hate each other in real life.)
A rumor. Really? You certainly like to spread rumors.
BTW - the fact that Hunter is having his day in court shoots down your "argument" in the Stormy thread that Hunter is above the law.
Interesting that neither Joe nor Hunter are whining about the trial being rigged or they are perfectly innocent. Sort of like how we all expect adults to behave.
LOL, you are supposed to meekly comply when you are brought up on false charges?
The famous laptop will be part of this case. The same laptop that K's media sources proclaimed was Russian disinformation. In fact, when the New York Post tried to print an article saying that it was actually Hunter's computer, Twitter banned them.
Yes, the press was banned from telling the truth because it might hurt President Biden's chances to be elected. US intelligence agencies also claimed it was Russian lies. It wasn't, but the Deep State didn't not want Trump to win so they openly lied.
Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.
FredHayek wrote: LOL, you are supposed to meekly comply when you are brought up on false charges?
So you are saying that Hunter's charges are false. Good to know.
Why are you saying we have to be meek? How in the world can you get that from what I wrote? What I am saying is that Hunter is being tried in the justice system, just as he should. He is letting justice play out in the courtroom without whining to the press each day, telling us that his trial is "rigged."
FredHayek wrote: Yes, the press was banned from telling the truth because it might hurt President Biden's chances to be elected. US intelligence agencies also claimed it was Russian lies. It wasn't, but the Deep State didn't not want Trump to win so they openly lied.
Exactly how is the press being banned from telling what truth? Show me. Provide your evidence. Otherwise, it's just more of your rumors and innuendo.
Twitter banned the NY Post from posting on their website for months based on government supplied information that the government knew was untrue.
That is government censorship. Just like when the Biden Administration urged Facebook to throttle accounts that were telling people vaccines were dangerous, example, Johnson and Johnson, that was eventually pulled from the market because it was dangerous!
It worries me that you are okay with government intimidating social media platforms into censorship. Technically it wasn't the government trampling your 1st Amendment rights. Instead it was government bullying corporations into censoring your 1st Amendment rights.
Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.
FredHayek wrote: Twitter banned the NY Post from posting on their website for months based on government supplied information that the government knew was untrue.
Twitter is not the government. It's a private company that can set whatever policy they desire.
FredHayek wrote: Twitter banned the NY Post from posting on their website for months based on government supplied information that the government knew was untrue.
Twitter is not the government. It's a private company that can set whatever policy they desire.
Do you really want to piss off the government? They can prosecute you for all kinds of crimes, or subject you to endless audits. They have become goons with too much power.
Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.
FredHayek wrote: These crimes happened years ago, and many of Hunter's more serious have somehow passed the statute of limitations. Isn't that convenient?
And yet, Hunter is being prosecuted. Are you the one on this board who has stated that there are two systems of justice, one for R and one for D? Pretty sure you are that person, but hey, that has now been dis-proven.
Oh, yeah, Bob Menendez, a democrat, is also being prosecuted. Funny how the wheels of justice turn against those who break the law. Hmmmm.
