Hobby Lobby.....look,listen and question

homeagain wrote:

FredHayek wrote:

homeagain wrote: The silence is deafening .....MATRIARCHAL VS. PATRIARCHAL......yes, not all subscribe to the antiquated
ideas that the religious sector have instilled. Honoring the elders and seeing the wisdom of woman,r foreign to the USA.....sad saga of backward thinking.

Women have never be more powerful in American society. Sadly instead of a strong and independent female candidate to become the first woman President, the Democrats chose a drunk who has very few accomplishments to her name. One of the worst candidates for President in my life. RFK Jr is more charismatic and speaks better despite his "brain worms".

you truly, in your heart of hearts,believe that???? LOOK to see how many CEO;S R ON THE BOARDS OF LARGE CORP WE DO NOT EVEN HAVE CONTROL OVER OUR OWN BODIES.....that ,in itself, is a refuted answer to the bolded.

Turn it around, which decade did American women have more power? 1970? 1990? 2010? 2020? Another decade?

And is the right to murder your child in the womb the most important part of being a powerful woman?

homeagain wrote:

FredHayek wrote:

homeagain wrote: The silence is deafening .....MATRIARCHAL VS. PATRIARCHAL......yes, not all subscribe to the antiquated
ideas that the religious sector have instilled. Honoring the elders and seeing the wisdom of woman,r foreign to the USA.....sad saga of backward thinking.

Women have never be more powerful in American society. Sadly instead of a strong and independent female candidate to become the first woman President, the Democrats chose a drunk who has very few accomplishments to her name. One of the worst candidates for President in my life. RFK Jr is more charismatic and speaks better despite his "brain worms".

you truly, in your heart of hearts,believe that???? LOOK to see how many CEO;S R ON THE BOARDS OF LARGE CORP WE DO NOT EVEN HAVE CONTROL OVER OUR OWN BODIES.....that ,in itself, is a refuted answer to the bolded.

Do you mean like Heidi Petz over at Sherwin-Williams, or Mary Barra at GM, Jane Frasier at Citigroup, Priscilla Almodovar at Fannie Mae, Safra Catz at Oracle, Susan Griffith at Progressive, or Kathy Warden at Northrup Grumman? There's a woman CEO at over 10% of the Fortune 500 corporations, not to mention the millions of women who are the owner/president of their own companies these days.

And the reality of the other situation is that a woman does have control over her own body, just not the body belonging to another individual while she is pregnant. All of us being created equal and all that sort of thing. Yeah, for the entirety of our history we've fallen short of that ideal, probably won't ever reach it if we're being honest, but that shouldn't stop us from trying to get there, now should it.

There's a woman CEO at over 10% of the Fortune 500 corporations,....Just WOW. a stunning percentage
by fobes fortune 500....I would be impressed by your statement IF THAT NUMBER WAS 20 OR 30. my POINT, IS parity OR A SEMBALANCE OF. ( what a concept)

Forcing unnatural gender roles takes a very long time to play out. You know women still have babies and raise families… right? I know the left thinks they have a better plan for women that is better than what God or nature designed, but the fact that there’s a mental heath crisis in or female population should tell you that messing with the natural order may not turn out well for women.

Maybe, just maybe, women are wired differently than men and their happiness may not be enhanced by more money and a more prestigious job. My wife told me several times that the most meaningful part of her life was raising our 3 kids (and we just met our first grandchild).

Now we are partners in a restaurant, but I believe should could do anything else she believed in. We didn’t start the restaurant to get rich, because we won’t. We started it because we wanted to be part of a great community and to make a lot of new friends.

A fulfilled life doesn’t come from being a CEO of some big company, it comes from having an abundance of friends and family.

homeagain wrote: There's a woman CEO at over 10% of the Fortune 500 corporations,....Just WOW. a stunning percentage
by fobes fortune 500....I would be impressed by your statement IF THAT NUMBER WAS 20 OR 30. my POINT, IS parity OR A SEMBALANCE OF. ( what a concept)

Maybe women don't want to work 80 hour weeks? Or not as many do?
And while many get envious of their big paychecks, there is a lot of turnover at those levels. Execs burn out, are fired when they don't deliver results, ruin their health.
Same thing happens with politicians. Some can muscle on forever like Boxer and Pelosi, but the New Zealand and Finnish female prime ministers retired after only a couple of terms.
Gives me more appreciation for those like Margaret Thatcher and Indira Ghandi.

a fulfilled life comes from the freedom to make a choice or have options in front of u.....u decide the path of your life. Some women elect to have a dream become a career and follow their talents and heart, OTHERS
WOULD CHOOSE A DIFFERENT, MORE CONVENTIONAL PATH....the path to fulfillment is FREEDOM