Rick wrote: Those are in your bubble... CNN and MSNBC use the same talking points and all those sources have 95% negative coverage of Trump. The door isn't that hard to open, you just have to walk through it.
Love seeing the leftist press have so little influence this election cycle.
They have been calling Trump Hitler since 2015 yet this race is still tight.
Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.
The media has very little credibility left with the American people, just like all of our government agencies that are politically corrupted and don’t work… like the Department of Education.
"So I read in the paper today that The Washington Post and The LA Times for the first time ever [are] not endorsing a candidate in this race yet," Maher began the discussion.
"First of all, it's charming they think it matters to anybody. It's hysterical to me," Maher later said. "They think a newspaper editorial is going to change one mind, but in the past, it's what we've done."
WaPo lost what, 200K subscribers because they refused to endorse Harris? I have to agree with Maher here . . . it's cute that collectivists believe that a person's decision on which candidate to vote for is going to be swayed by the OpEd editors of a newspaper. 200K subscribers, who are angry that either their own decision hasn't received confirmation from those editors, or they believe that voters are going to tell themselves that the editors are much smarter than they are so they should vote for the editor's pick and not endorsing Harris is going to cost her votes.
Has anyone, anyone at all, ever in their life, let the OpEd editors at any newspaper be the deciding voice in how they will cast their vote in an election?
Rick wrote: The media has very little credibility left with the American people, just like all of our government agencies that are politically corrupted and don’t work… like the Department of Education.
The public trusts Congress more than the liberal press.
Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.
