DRY RUN ...DO IT AND SEE

The military isn’t supposed to be used for day-to-day law enforcement

Using active-duty troops on U.S. soil is supposed to be rare. There’s a federal law — the Posse Comitatus Act — that restricts when the president can use the military for domestic law enforcement. “It says no use of the military in civilian spheres unless absolutely urgent,” Wehle told me in June. “Protests do not count.”

The National Guard typically helps in emergencies to support federal agencies and local police, like guarding federal facilities or guiding traffic.

“It’s historically been used when law enforcement are completely overwhelmed and have requested it,” Ariela Rosenberg, a national security expert with Protect Democracy, explained to me in June when Trump sent troops into Los Angeles. PER WAPO

IF U R ''PRESENT'' U WOULD SEE THIS FOR WHAT IT IS.....A TEST RUN TO TOTAL RULE....WAKE UP....IT IS ILLEGAL AND THE LAW SAYS SO

Everyone's definition of an emergency is different?

homeagain wrote: The military isn’t supposed to be used for day-to-day law enforcement

Using active-duty troops on U.S. soil is supposed to be rare. There’s a federal law — the Posse Comitatus Act — that restricts when the president can use the military for domestic law enforcement. “It says no use of the military in civilian spheres unless absolutely urgent,” Wehle told me in June. “Protests do not count.”

The National Guard typically helps in emergencies to support federal agencies and local police, like guarding federal facilities or guiding traffic.

“It’s historically been used when law enforcement are completely overwhelmed and have requested it,” Ariela Rosenberg, a national security expert with Protect Democracy, explained to me in June when Trump sent troops into Los Angeles. PER WAPO

IF U R ''PRESENT'' U WOULD SEE THIS FOR WHAT IT IS.....A TEST RUN TO TOTAL RULE....WAKE UP....IT IS ILLEGAL AND THE LAW SAYS SO

You fail to understand what the people want, which is to feel safe in their cities. You also fail to acknowledge how the Democrats weaponized the DOJ, FBI, and CIA in order to take out their political opponents. IF[b/] Trump is drifting outside the rules, he’s doing it to make cities safer, while the Democrats did it in order to keep their power.

How many decades has Chicago been one of our top murder capitals? When was the last time we heard a Democrat talking about a strategy to end the crime and killing in a meaningful way? NEVER

Chicago needs a daddy and it’s about to get one.

LET'S AMEND THAT TO ''CHICAGO NEEDS A LEGAL MOB BOSS,WHO, JUST LIKE THE SUB SET
USURPS THE LAW.".....OH, WAIT A MINUTE, I AM REMISS,I WE HAVE ONE.ALREADY.

If cleaning up that city requires a mob boss, I say lets bring in a mob boss (or a president who still has a set of balls). Your Democrats have failed to stop the crime and murders so I think the people of Chicago deserve to have a real leader that doesn't put the criminals before the law abiding citizens.

AND THERE U HAVE IT.....LAWS OF OUR NATION R TO BE DISMISSED AND JUST DO WHAT U WISH....U WILL REGRET THAT POST,,....WATCH AND WAIT

homeagain wrote: The military isn’t supposed to be used for day-to-day law enforcement

Using active-duty troops on U.S. soil is supposed to be rare. There’s a federal law — the Posse Comitatus Act — that restricts when the president can use the military for domestic law enforcement. “It says no use of the military in civilian spheres unless absolutely urgent,” Wehle told me in June. “Protests do not count.”

The National Guard typically helps in emergencies to support federal agencies and local police, like guarding federal facilities or guiding traffic.

“It’s historically been used when law enforcement are completely overwhelmed and have requested it,” Ariela Rosenberg, a national security expert with Protect Democracy, explained to me in June when Trump sent troops into Los Angeles. PER WAPO

IF U R ''PRESENT'' U WOULD SEE THIS FOR WHAT IT IS.....A TEST RUN TO TOTAL RULE....WAKE UP....IT IS ILLEGAL AND THE LAW SAYS SO

Riots do count . . . as does persistent lawlessness which local or State action has failed to subdue. And certainly the enforcement of federal laws to locate and remove millions of criminal aliens falls under that designation.

PrintSmith wrote:

homeagain wrote: The military isn’t supposed to be used for day-to-day law enforcement

Using active-duty troops on U.S. soil is supposed to be rare. There’s a federal law — the Posse Comitatus Act — that restricts when the president can use the military for domestic law enforcement. “It says no use of the military in civilian spheres unless absolutely urgent,” Wehle told me in June. “Protests do not count.”

The National Guard typically helps in emergencies to support federal agencies and local police, like guarding federal facilities or guiding traffic.

“It’s historically been used when law enforcement are completely overwhelmed and have requested it,” Ariela Rosenberg, a national security expert with Protect Democracy, explained to me in June when Trump sent troops into Los Angeles. PER WAPO

IF U R ''PRESENT'' U WOULD SEE THIS FOR WHAT IT IS.....A TEST RUN TO TOTAL RULE....WAKE UP....IT IS ILLEGAL AND THE LAW SAYS SO

Riots do count . . . as does persistent lawlessness which local or State action has failed to subdue. And certainly the enforcement of federal laws to locate and remove millions of criminal aliens falls under that designation.

[/b]

THOSE WORDS...BOLDED....R THE PROBLEM , THERE IS NO MECHANISM,BUT A WIDE CAST NET
FOR REMOVAL....TRUMP HAS INDICTED INNOCENT FAMILIES INTO THIS EXTREMELY ILL RUN, ILLEGAL "IMMIGRATION SCHEME" THAT MAKES HIM APPEAR THAT HE IS ''SAVING'' OUR NATION...HE IS A DICTATOR, AND YET THOSE THAT DEEM HIM A HERO R APPLAUDING THE ATROCITY

There is a mechanism available, but the sanctuary cities/States won't implement that mechanism and are actively failing to use that mechanism in pursuit of political profit over the rule of law.

Instead of holding criminal aliens that are arrested for, oh, I don't know, domestic battery, armed robbery, assaults, DUI, expired visas, and other offenses on a very long list, for Immigration to process and remove they turn them loose back into the society to do more harm.

Since the federal government is left to do the task alone, they are out in the community looking for these folks, and come across other immigration violations along the way, which they then have to take into custody, process, and remove because they are law enforcement officers, they can't just ignore a violation of immigration law. That means the officers out in the field are going to find, and take into custody, aliens whose violation is limited to crossing the border illegally and identity fraud to obtain a SS Number for employment purposes, or even just coming across the border as a child with their parents in search of a better life.

Now, Polis and Johnson are all for assisting federal officers to enforce drug laws, firearm laws, human trafficking laws . . . put these same politicians are putting up road blocks to assist federal officers in the removal of criminal aliens that are violating other laws in addition to the violation of immigration laws.

PrintSmith wrote: There is a mechanism available, but the sanctuary cities/States won't implement that mechanism and are actively failing to use that mechanism in pursuit of political profit over the rule of law.

Instead of holding criminal aliens that are arrested for, oh, I don't know, domestic battery, armed robbery, assaults, DUI, expired visas, and other offenses on a very long list, for Immigration to process and remove they turn them loose back into the society to do more harm.

Since the federal government is left to do the task alone, they are out in the community looking for these folks, and come across other immigration violations along the way, which they then have to take into custody, process, and remove because they are law enforcement officers, they can't just ignore a violation of immigration law. That means the officers out in the field are going to find, and take into custody, aliens whose violation is limited to crossing the border illegally and identity fraud to obtain a SS Number for employment purposes, or even just coming across the border as a child with their parents in search of a better life.

FIRST BOLDED...THERE IS A REASON,THE PRISONS R OVERCROWDED, JUST LIKE HOSPITALS THAT RELEASE ILL FUNCTIONING MENTAL PATIENTS OUT ONTO THE STREETS,LITERALLY IN THEIR NITE CLOTHES....DEFICIT IN SPACE, AVAILABLE FUNDING AND MANPOWER.

SECOND BOLDED...U MAY LIKE TO THINK THAT IS WHAT IS OCCURRING,BUT IF U DO A DEEP DIVE U SEE THE OPPOSITE.......A WIDE NET IS BEING UTILIZED AND THE SYSTEM THEN DUMPS THEM INTO ANOTHER COUNTRY THAT IS NOT EVEN THEIR ORIGINAL RESIDENCE.