Training AI'S To Invent New Diseases

We both retired. Mine as they were replacing the accounting and inventory software system. It was time for an upgrade but I really got a feel that the new users don't really understand how it works.

But it seems that way with Generation Z. I was writing my own programs in high school, but they just drive it and don't understand what makes it tick.

Aubrey wrote: Sp many points to address. Frist, HA please tell us how your medical records were hacked by AI, No substantiation means BS. Second, Fred, did those who took your places able to provide the same service at a lesser cost.? Did you leave before being replaced?
The definition of free enterprise.

"The reason they r employed is because their pay scale was less strain on the corp budget...IF they had excellent background in SME(subject matter expert)....they would have demanded more money....it's the corp. way"
Another nonsensical comment by. HA. If you provided a service superior to those who supplanted you at a competitive price, you would have an argument.
Again the definition of freed enterprise.

! BOLDED...i REQUESTED ALL OF MY PCP'S NOTES UPON FINDING ANOTHER DOCTOR, THIS EGOCENTRIC, AUTHORITATIVE IDIOT USED A.I. TO GENERATE MY RECORDS....i READ THOSE RECENT RECORDS AND FOUND MANY OMISSIONS AND ERRORS..AND STATEMENTS I NEVER MADE....LONG STORY SHORT...I TOOK IT UP WITH THE OFFICE MANAGER,THE CEO OF THE CLINIC AND THE PCP INVOLVED...IT TOOK ABOUT 9 MONTHS TO SCHEDULE A CONFERENCE WITH THEM, BUT SUFFICE TO SAY i WAS RIGHT AND GOT AN APOLOGY...OH AND THE CEO DID NOT KNOW THE PCP HAD A MEDICAL SIDE HUSSLE GOING (A.I. SHORTCUT ON RECORD KEEPING)....HE WAS HUSTLING THE WEIGHT LOSE DRUG THAT IS NOW THE RAGE.......JUST AS A SIDE NOTE, THE CEO WAS NOT MONITORING HIM, KNEW NOTHING ABOUT IT....THEN HE STARTED MONITORING AND GUESS WHAT THE PCP WAS NOT HAPPY THAT HE HAD TO REPORT
BACK TO THE CEO AND SOME TIME LATER HE RESIGNED ANS STARTED UP A CONCIERGE
PROTOCOL....DO NOT ASSUME I AM STUPID


Another nonsensical comment by. HA. If you provided a service superior to those who supplanted you at a competitive price, you would have an argument.
Again the definition of freed enterprise.

17 YEARS IN CORP AMERICA, SAW IT TIME AND TIME AGAIN.....LOST INVALUABLE KNOWLEDGE
GO OUT THE DOOR...KNOWLEDGE TO GET THINGS DONE,,THRU THE BACK DOOR, NEWBIES HAD NO CONTACTS,BARE BONES BASICS AND IT WAS FUBARRED.....DO NOT THINK I AM STUPID

I do not think that you are stupid. I do think that you are not smart.
AI did not hack your medical records, Your PCP (?) used the word processing of a computer system. to generate records and did not check for errors, as you did. That is not hacking.
As to your 17 yrs in Corporate America, the company or companies that you worked for had a different opinion of your value. They made the decision that they could supplant you with another individual/s more efficiently at a lesser cost.

IF u have been following the A.I. issue, u would know it 's is becoming a monster....utilizing it's own protocol and NOT the coder...no this was not a word processor,I researched the footnotes and the program....the point was the CEO was over extended and was not monitoring his personnel or his clinic, the reason we had a conference was because I presented info to him,he was unaware of... A BILL WORKING IT'S WAY THRU THE SYSTEM TO WARN ALL CONSUMERS/CLIENTS THAT A.I.
. WAS BEING USED....THAT WA NOT THE CASE IN MY RECORDS.

as to the workers being displaced...I worked for AT & T......provisioning orders for clients...when u do not have a "back door "contact, u have delays, incorrect information,"referred out"to another entity and YOUR CLIENT does not get his desired Due Date for service....that then creates a difficult conversation 'WHY IS MY DUE DATE BEING PUSHED OUT? MARKETING ASSURED ME THAT IT WAS DOABLE AND NO WORRIES...u then have to placate the client and express that he can have this expedited IF he escalates
ALL BECAUSE A NEWBIE WAS NOT EXPERIENCED/NO BACK DOOR/ IN A LEARNING CURVE.

The issue is repeated over and over again...in today's timeframe....I can call n office,any office talk to a rep.,get a reply that is not satisfactory and then call back again...GET A REP THAT GIVES ME THE CORRECT INFO AND ANSWERS MY QUESTION THAT WAS LEFT HANGING PREVIOUSLY. SO YOUR REPLY HOLDS NO VALIDITY

Your stream of consciousness thinking is reflected in your syntax: totally unintelligible.

FredHayek wrote: Anyone else think this is a bad idea?

Anyone, anyone at all, think it's a good one?

NOT my problem, if u can't comprehend ideas....AUBREY, JUST TO BE CLEAR

HA,
If you believe that. it is not your problem then perhaps you can become aware of why you were let go at AT&T.

PrintSmith wrote:

FredHayek wrote: Anyone else think this is a bad idea?

Anyone, anyone at all, think it's a good one?

My friend who is a recent retiree from CDC loves Fauci and supports even more gain of function research. Beagles be damned!

Aubrey wrote: HA,
If you believe that. it is not your problem then perhaps you can become aware of why you were let go at AT&T.

[/b]

U ASSUME MUCH......PERHAPS IT WOULD BE ADVISABLE TO KNOW THE FACTS...oh, but that would be too practical and pragmatic, for an individual that likes to "down talk".