Becky wrote: The grammar police are back. Why is it when someone disagrees with another....they attack the grammar? Is it an attempt to diminish someones belief or ideas by pointing out that they are somehow to stupid to use good grammar so therefore their thoughts should be discounted?
Just curious.
And some people are so devoid of anything to back up their arguments that they focus on the fact that I pointed out a grammatical error in the middle of a lot of ideas I find abhorrent and disgusting in the right-wing movement, that they fail to even notice what I said.
I think your posts stand all by themselves LJ.
Many of us see you hatefulness for exactly what it is, including those on your own side of the fence.
Pot/Kettle/Black on the name calling darlin'
Your right....I failed to read the point you were trying to make because I was having a hard time getting past the hateful BS. You might want to give that some thought.
Becky wrote: The grammar police are back. Why is it when someone disagrees with another....they attack the grammar? Is it an attempt to diminish someones belief or ideas by pointing out that they are somehow to stupid to use good grammar so therefore their thoughts should be discounted?
Just curious.
As fast as I type I don't worry about the ignorant grammar police who have nothing better to say to defend their position. I have an IQ well north of 130, and could join Mensa. I am not worried about a few typos.
Becky wrote: People who have worked hard for their money don't particularly want Robin Hood to come take it and share it.
They would prefer to offer those less fortunate a job and let them earn it.
OMG. That is awful.
So now they are putting their money into stopping what they believe is wrong. That is terrible.
and yes....I would agree.
Carry on!
I believe I did post my opinion LJ. I also had an opinion about your need to attack people in such trivial ways whenever you can.
I never got to your point because I was so put off with your attack. To be honest...I really don't care about your point!
Its not so much a third party as it is an idea and movement towards that idea. Honestly, please show a list of TEA Party candidates. Most people running for office are still Republican, Democrat, Independant, Libertarian, Constitution, Green, Socialist and so on.
Now you're up to five posts attacking me personally rather than dealing with the bullsh** about which group is actually trying to "change the Constitution."
Rave on... What? Can't back up your shoot-from-the-lip claim about which group is trying to do that?
Becky wrote: The grammar police are back. Why is it when someone disagrees with another....they attack the grammar? Is it an attempt to diminish someones belief or ideas by pointing out that they are somehow to stupid to use good grammar so therefore their thoughts should be discounted?
Just curious.
As fast as I type I don't worry about the ignorant grammar police who have nothing better to say to defend their position. I have an IQ well north of 130, and could join Mensa. I am not worried about a few typos.
