So, you must have been an eye witness to know that he had her while she was unconscious. Why didn't you step up to the plate and testify? How can you expect Buck to do what is right when people whine after the fact instead of stepping forward and do their civic duty.
I hear 88 professors at Duke have a manifesto that they no longer need and will lend to you so that you can properly express your outrage and support for your victim.
daisypusher wrote: So, you must have been an eye witness to know that he had her while she was unconscious. Why didn't you step up to the plate and testify? How can you expect Buck to do what is right when people whine after the fact instead of stepping forward and do their civic duty.
:rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl
Interesting to read what lengths you will go to to deflect the attention away from your candidate and onto your fellow posters.
Carry on.....this gets more interesting by the minute.
Always thinking things through and knowing the motive. My candidate? Sorry, did not vote for Buck (Yes, I already voted) - now think of another conspiracy to make your world feel safe enough for you to function.
archer wrote: Its not Buck you are defending, but a mans right to rape a woman when she is unable to protest
Which will be perfectly acceptable when Sharia law gains it's foothold in America.
If it does, it will be the far right wing of the republican party that supports it....
Very weak. You can do better than that. Are you feeling okay?
It is the liberal-slanted judges' warped interpretions of our Constitution that puts us at risk of becomming the UK's Sharia stepchild. A couple examples...
JusSayin wrote: [It is the liberal-slanted judges' warped interpretions of our Constitution that puts us at risk of becomming the UK's Sharia stepchild. A couple examples...