Hartman flushed in Jefferson County

netdude wrote: I voted for Rosier, one reason I did was that Hartman was the swing vote to allow the Deer Creek Challenge to go on... and opened the door to more of these events allowing the plum-smugglers to crowd Deer Creek Canyon, South Deer Creek and Pleasant Park....

rofllol rofllol rofllol rofllol http://www.hipmama.com/node/19066

didn't get a vote in this one but keep up with jeffco commissioners - mostly when the canyon courier sues them for violating sunshine laws. good to see her go!

Rosier seems pretty pro-development.

You all don't get to b!tch when he votes for allowing someone to pave your favorite meadow.

i don't get to vote any way but my aunt does. hartman started out decent, keeping in touch with constituents initially but then sold her soul to the highest bidder. i am glad to see her gone.

time to get someone else who hopefully will be more in tune with their constituents and do what is best for the county.

mtntrekker wrote: i don't get to vote any way but my aunt does. hartman started out decent, keeping in touch with constituents initially but then sold her soul to the highest bidder. i am glad to see her gone.

time to get someone else who hopefully will be more in tune with their constituents and do what is best for the county.

...even if it means paving over a meadow for a new McDonalds...

LadyJazzer wrote:

mtntrekker wrote: i don't get to vote any way but my aunt does. hartman started out decent, keeping in touch with constituents initially but then sold her soul to the highest bidder. i am glad to see her gone.

time to get someone else who hopefully will be more in tune with their constituents and do what is best for the county.

...even if it means paving over a meadow for a new McDonalds...

Everyone can feel comforted when that happens by telling themselves "It wasn't Hartman, It wasn't Hartman, It wasn't..."

LadyJazzer wrote:

mtntrekker wrote: i don't get to vote any way but my aunt does. hartman started out decent, keeping in touch with constituents initially but then sold her soul to the highest bidder. i am glad to see her gone.

time to get someone else who hopefully will be more in tune with their constituents and do what is best for the county.

...even if it means paving over a meadow for a new McDonalds...

PAVE AWAY! Chop a few trees down while you are at it!

Depends on who owns the theoretical meadow. With all the empty buildings up here, growth may involve getting them occupied.

HEARTLESS wrote: Depends on who owns the theoretical meadow. With all the empty buildings up here, growth may involve getting them occupied.

Growth is not a developer's goal.

Developing is.

One of Rosier's stated goals is to make it easier to rezone land.

You don't normally have to rezone to fill one of the empty buildings.

Wouldn't rezoning also encourage property sales in a slow economy? Where is this meadow thats threatened?