Another bad idea in the name of art

ComputerBreath wrote: Explain to me how this is art?

It can't be rationally explained.
It's expensive.
It serves no functional purpose.

therefore, it's gotta be art.

I used to live in Evergreen. I was forced to leave when my doctor told me I was allergic to sculpture. I have an uncle in Madison, WI that is allergic to conceptual art...

JusSayin wrote: Can he do it over the Rio Grande instead? The illegals would appreciate the shade on their way in.

rofllol

So this guy is going to put tarps over the river for two weeks - the point? How is running cables and covering them with cloth art?

Does this make my clothesline on sheet washing day art? Why then, my great grandma was an artist too!

May I ask where one might purchase these sheets once Christo removes them from the river?