Then they would have to do the same job a second time, review it and vote on it again. By whose standards would any law be judged? Yours Scruffy, or mine?
Wouldn't voting by another legislative body, made up of different legislators a decade apart provide that answer?
Then they would have to do the same job a second time, review it and vote on it again. By whose standards would any law be judged? Yours Scruffy, or mine?
Wouldn't voting by another legislative body, made up of different legislators a decade apart provide that answer?
Well, that's the problem, isn't it? What if it were a law about murder? Would a law which states that murder is a crime need to be reviewed every 10 years? Or are we talking only about appropriation bills & stuff like that?
