LadyJazzer wrote: No... Here was the discussion, since you seem to have forgotten:
I just love watching hysterical righties who think that asking those making over $250,000 to pay an extra 3.9% on THAT PORTION OF THEIR INCOME OVER $250,000 is the end of the world, and everyone should sell their personal property... (Particularly, when it's a pretty safe bet that the ones screaming the loudest, i.e., AV8OR, aren't in that category, and won't see their middle-class tax cuts touched--Unless, of course, Boehner and the TeaBaggers decide to let ALL the cuts expire just to prove a point...)
rofllol rofllol
You guys crack me up... You want some cheese with that whine?
I do not get the connection of someone else's post to what you and I were discussing. Am I responsible for some other subject as stated by someone else? Are you not quite sane?
major bean wrote: Two women charge Slick Willy with rape and you have no doubts? How do you navigate around the house with your eyes closed?
Two women, who have had their story discounted at the time, and no charges were ever filed, bring it up decades later coincidentally when Hillary writes a book that ignores them......and you DON'T have doubts?
No doubts whatsoever. Hilary is a whore to politics. She would put up with anything for the echo of applause in her ears. Bill destroyed his varacity whanever he stated that "I did not have sex with THAT woman".
And the operative word in your post is "discounted"..............not disproved.
major bean wrote: No doubts whatsoever. Hilary is a whore to politics. She would put up with anything for the echo of applause in her ears. Bill destroyed his varacity whanever he stated that "I did not have sex with THAT woman".
Right, so the ladies must be telling the truth because Clinton lied about a different incident? I just love the way you circumvent the courts and pronounce Clinton guilty, when the prosecutors and the FBI discounted their story. I'm sure all those FBI'ers were liberals. Couldn't be because you hate the man could it? Nah.....surely you would be impartial if a similar story was about a republican.....sure you would......nah, no you wouldn't.
No one said anything about loving the man....where did you get that? Just trying to bring a little sanity to the conservative lynch mob here.
major bean wrote: I am not a Republican.
How can you bring sanity whenever you make assumptions based on your imaginary fantasies?
Are you trying to tell me you don't favor the right as opposed to the left? Is the Republican party on the right, as opposed to the left? Assumptions are made from what we learn from another's posts, you sure seemed to be on the right, but if you are somehow a closet lefty, then you have my apologies.
Another person who thinks "if it ain't this, then it definitely must be that!". There must be only two makes of autos in the world. Only two types of shoes. If it ain't black then it must be white.
It is difficult to fathom the depths of shallow thought.
rofllol
