Man Faces Criminal Charges for Reading Wife's E-Mail

27 Dec 2010 13:57 #1 by Nmysys
Man Faces Criminal Charges for Reading Wife's E-Mail

Published December 27, 2010

| FoxNews.com

ROCHESTER HILLS, Mich. – A Michigan man found out about his wife's affair -- but somehow he's the one in trouble, and may is now facing criminal charges.

Thirty-three-year-old Leon Walker used his wife's password to get into her Gmail account, and says he learned of his wife's affair by reading her e-mail on their computer. Clara Walker filed for a divorce, which was granted this month, and Leon Walker will stand trial Feb. 7 -- on felony computer misuse charges.

Walker told The Oakland Press that he was trying to protect the couple's children from neglect and calls the case a "miscarriage of justice."

“I feel very strongly that I’ll be exonerated,” Walker told the paper.


Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2010/12/27/michigan-man-criminal-charges-reading-email/#ixzz19LcpsS3Z

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

27 Dec 2010 14:23 #2 by mtntrekker
lol bet he won't do that again!

bumper sticker - honk if you will pay my mortgage

"The problem with Socialism is that eventually you run out of other people's money." attributed to Margaret Thatcher

"A wise and frugal government, which shall leave men free to regulate their own pursuits of industry and improvement, and shall not take from the mouth of labor the bread it has earned - this is the sum of good government." Thomas Jefferson

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

27 Dec 2010 14:46 #3 by Nmysys
She won't either!!

I think he will beat it!!!

Don't touch that.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

27 Dec 2010 14:47 #4 by PrintSmith
I guess it's true then. What's his is hers in the marriage, and what's hers is hers as well.

The court will toss it out when it gets there, otherwise there will be a lot of people being arrested in the near future for peeking at the call/text records on their significant others' phones, especially if the two of them are simply dating and not married. Those smart phones are mini computers after all.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

27 Dec 2010 14:59 - 27 Dec 2010 15:03 #5 by mtntrekker
do you really think the d.a. will throw it out? i know the d.a. and courts would rather not deal with some stuff, but sometimes they do have to look at the evidence. i would think he would need permission unless it was his property. if it is thrown out, i'm betting she is planning on proving in a civil action that it was her property and he didn't have permission.

bumper sticker - honk if you will pay my mortgage

"The problem with Socialism is that eventually you run out of other people's money." attributed to Margaret Thatcher

"A wise and frugal government, which shall leave men free to regulate their own pursuits of industry and improvement, and shall not take from the mouth of labor the bread it has earned - this is the sum of good government." Thomas Jefferson

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

27 Dec 2010 15:01 #6 by Nmysys
Funny that you say that Printsmith. I know mine is definitely smarter than I am. I have had it about 9 days now. LOL

The last paragraph said that it was a shared computer MtnTrekker.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

27 Dec 2010 15:07 - 27 Dec 2010 15:24 #7 by mtntrekker
i went back and reread that. thanks. now it is even more interesting as to whether an adult has the right to privacy on a shared computer. i would think you have a right to privacy until you grant someone permission and then it is for as long as you grant that permission.

bumper sticker - honk if you will pay my mortgage

"The problem with Socialism is that eventually you run out of other people's money." attributed to Margaret Thatcher

"A wise and frugal government, which shall leave men free to regulate their own pursuits of industry and improvement, and shall not take from the mouth of labor the bread it has earned - this is the sum of good government." Thomas Jefferson

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

27 Dec 2010 15:14 #8 by daisypusher
A person would expect privacy on a password protect account. He is going down.... I do agree that if the genders were reversed, the the case would not even be prosecuted, since the DA would decide that he/she could not get a conviction.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

27 Dec 2010 15:19 #9 by Nmysys
So in your opinion, what is good for the gander is not good for the goose?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

27 Dec 2010 15:23 #10 by daisypusher
And vice versa. It is called equal protection under the law.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.152 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum
sponsors
© My Mountain Town (new)
Google+