Could someone define "Head-on" collision

14 Mar 2013 12:37 #1 by pacamom
If a car is involved in a head on collision would you expect damage to the front end?
The car in the picture in this story was involved in a head on crash yesterday. Unfortunately the driver passed away. It appears from reading the story that this accident was not her fault. I always thought that if there was a head on crash, both cars had to hit 'head on'. Has the definition changed, or have I always misunderstoon?


http://www.9news.com/news/article/32350 ... ses-Hwy-93

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

14 Mar 2013 12:45 #2 by Blazer Bob
If they had said head on crash I would agree with you but this is what I read, "re-entered the southbound lane and struck the Jaguar Head-on. "

Can't I run into a tree "head on"?


On a larger note, I frequently hear and read media that makes me wonder if the writer or talking head graduated from 8'th grade.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

14 Mar 2013 12:54 #3 by FredHayek
PM, I always thought head-on collision was as you described it too.

Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

14 Mar 2013 13:02 #4 by BuyersAgent1
I agree the description is a little misleading but think the author was trying to express that the damaged car encountered an object in front of it (at its head) at the time of impact -- a generic way of saying the damaged car was "headed" forward and the momentum of the other vehicle was in opposition.

As a generic definition, I would not think a "head-on collision" inherently describes fault on both drivers' parts (and agree that an object or even a person can be hit head-on) but in a two-car incident I would expect the majority of damage at both front ends as opposed to a front and side, I suppose (now that I think about it).

What an awful wreck. If Jaguar brakes and steering can't avoid such an occurrence, I figure nothing can. Karma.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

14 Mar 2013 17:57 #5 by Mary Scott

BuyersAgent wrote: If Jaguar brakes and steering can't avoid such an occurrence, I figure nothing can. Karma.

Karma?!?!?! Seriously!?!?!? Could you please explain why "karma"? What do you know about the woman that she deserved to die?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

14 Mar 2013 21:21 #6 by otisptoadwater
I think most would agree a head on collision looks like this:



:sarcasm: It makes me wonder if the press sticks to the dramatic phrases because blood and death sells. :sarcasm:

I can explain it to you but I can't understand it for you.

"Any man who thinks he can be happy and prosperous by letting the Government take care of him; better take a closer look at the American Indian." - Henry Ford

Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges; When the Republic is at its most corrupt the laws are most numerous. - Publius Cornelius Tacitus

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

15 Mar 2013 00:17 #7 by BuyersAgent1
Mary, my comment was a reference to the apparently unavoidable nature of the accident from the victim's perspective, and simply shorthand for, "There are some things we'll never understand," that's all. Maybe "Fate" is a better word, for the piano falling on the innocent person who just happens to be walking underneath it.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.150 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum
sponsors
© My Mountain Town (new)
Google+