Residents in wildland-urban interface zones may have to pay

15 Aug 2013 10:22 #1 by ScienceChic
Thoughts? There are a lot of residents who do nothing to mitigate their property and this would make them pay so something could be done to reduce fire danger for everyone. On the other hand, we all know how efficiently the government actually works and it's likely that monies collected wouldn't be used effectively, and it punishes those who do pay to mitigate their property, or do it themselves.

I think I'd rather see charges filed for those who don't do anything themselves, rather than institute a fee or tax and make everyone pay. This task force may have good intentions, but this isn't the best way to mitigate the dangers.

Residents in wildland-urban interface zones may have to pay new fee or tax to protect homes
Task force considers assessment for high-risk area
Posted: 08/15/2013
Marshall Zelinger

EVERGREEN - Residents who live in wildfire danger zones may be asked to pay more to protect their homes.

In January, Gov. John Hickenlooper commissioned the task force on wildfire insurance and forest health. The task force is close to making its recommendations which may include a suggested fee for residents who live in the Wildland-Urban Interface -- or WUI.

"I don't have any objection to helping out the fire department, but to make it mandatory is a bunch of different things," said Evergreen resident Don Bish.

"It's not fees just for the sake of providing funds to the county, it is fees for the particular purpose of dealing with mitigation efforts on a countywide basis," said task force chairwoman Barbara Kelley. "Given the fact that these properties present a fairly unique risk profile, it might be a reasonable basis to have them share a little bit more in the cost of addressing and mitigating those risks."

Read more, or view the video, at: http://www.thedenverchannel.com/news/lo ... tect-homes

"Now, more than ever, the illusions of division threaten our very existence. We all know the truth: more connects us than separates us. But in times of crisis the wise build bridges, while the foolish build barriers. We must find a way to look after one another as if we were one single tribe.” -King T'Challa, Black Panther

The truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it. ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is. ~Winston Churchill

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

15 Aug 2013 10:29 #2 by FOS
this year....we had to change insurance companies because our rates doubled sending our mortgage up over 300 dollars a month. We weren't even asked if we had mitigated our property at all.
After several pictures and dialogue with our previous carrier.....we switched back and cut our rate in half.
My advice....check your policy and shop.
The rate hiker was the Hartford through AARP.
The rate cutter was Country Financial who have been fantastic to work with.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

15 Aug 2013 10:45 #3 by HappyCamper
We use Safeco and this year it went up 10.00 for the year last year it did not go up at all.

Three years ago we had over 150 trees cut off our 5 acres and each year we try to at least make a small dent in the pine needles but it is easy to fill 10 huge trash bags in a couple of hours.

We will keep plunking away but the property was not mitigated at all when we bought it so the needles are deep in many areas.

I wish we could dig a big hole and compost them but they do not break down.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

15 Aug 2013 11:47 #4 by RenegadeCJ
I think it is ridiculous for the govt to institute a generic fee. It should be between us and our insurers. Some of us use fire proof or fire resistant building materials and mitigate, others live in match boxes and don't mitigate. Why should both pay a fee?

Too bad future generations aren't here to see all the great things we are spending their $$ on!!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

15 Aug 2013 11:54 #5 by JMC
[headline=][/headline]

RenegadeCJ wrote: I think it is ridiculous for the govt to institute a generic fee. It should be between us and our insurers. Some of us use fire proof or fire resistant building materials and mitigate, others live in match boxes and don't mitigate. Why should both pay a fee?



The cost to make that determination would exceed the balance act they currently do. Not fair but more efficient.
Life.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

15 Aug 2013 12:08 #6 by RenegadeCJ

jmc wrote: [headline=][/headline]

RenegadeCJ wrote: I think it is ridiculous for the govt to institute a generic fee. It should be between us and our insurers. Some of us use fire proof or fire resistant building materials and mitigate, others live in match boxes and don't mitigate. Why should both pay a fee?



The cost to make that determination would exceed the balance act they currently do. Not fair but more efficient.
Life.


Wouldn't be hard to use google earth to see mitigation, and the county already knows your building materials. I fought an assessment a couple years ago and they pulled up the google map they already had for me. If you want to add a tax/fee, do it that way, another line item in your assessment.

Too bad future generations aren't here to see all the great things we are spending their $$ on!!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

15 Aug 2013 14:21 #7 by Grady
Bottom line, it's just the Democrat's attempt to collect more taxes, errr I mean Fees
from the poplus. let's see who else they could collect extra fees, Hail or tornado fees for those living east of I25, ground water diversion fees based on the non permable surfaces on your property, etc etc.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.150 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum
sponsors
© My Mountain Town (new)
Google+