An amazing fact on Tim Tebow

I think some people like to have "ownership" of their thread they start. LOL Not naming any names.

Its really no big deal. I'm so easy going. Haha

I think this thread needs to be un-merged and re-merged into a new thread about merging threads. LOL

Rockdoc Franz wrote: I simply do not get it. I hear that merging threads is not enthusiastically embraced, but It really does not bother me one bit.

I believe that is because you comment on more threads than you start and I start more threads than I comment on.

Merging is OK if the threads that are merged have less than 2 or 3 pages or have a life of less than a day. It is easier to follow that way. I don't see how you could try to merge threads that have many pages of comments or are several days apart. It is too confusing to find your way back through. If there is a thread that has a big page count with a long history & I make a new one of similar subject matter, I think the faster it is merged to the old one the better.

He who has a bigger truck gets to merge.


Oh never mind.

Sunshine Girl wrote:

The Viking wrote: Are you kidding me you POS site!!! I start a thread just for Tebowing pics and you bury it again? These pictures have NOTHING TO DO WITH THE AMAZING FACT ON TEBOW AND THE 316 YARDS. Pull the F'n stick out of your arses!! How pathetic are you Mods and the owner of this site? Are you that bored with your pathetic lives that you have to keep screwing with me? There are 5 threads started by people on the Bronco games and Tebow and they are all still seperate! You guys suck and I will continue to let people know on Facebook that you are going down the path of controlling others faster than Pinecam EVER did. It only took less than 2 years for the egos of the Mods you put in place to start taking over. I knew it was a mistake to come back and give you another chance and try and post positive posts here again! Way to screw up more positive threads and prove my point that you prefer the negative on this site!

Wow Viking, I never thought I would have said this, but I am so disappointed in how you act and treat people. You ARE way to serious and maybe you just won't be happy anywhere. I think you comments are rude and if you don't like it here then you should go somewhere else (although I don't know if a place exists that would be good enough for you) or go start your own site. Thank you JMC, CG, and SC for this great site and keep up the good work!

Viking might just be having a bad day...but to call the site a "POS" is clearly uncalled for, and an apology is in order

And Viking..Most QB's throw from between 250 and 325 yards a game so it's really not that amazing. Do you really think god is trying to comminicate with us by minipulating a quarterbacks total passing yard numbers? There has to be better ways..Earthquaks, Tidal waves, Volcanic eruptions to name a few

Photo-fish wrote:

Martin Ent Inc wrote: Tim Tebow is the most famous white Bronco since OJ's getaway vehicle.

rofllol rofllol
Nice one! I'm re-stealing it.

Photo-fish wrote: Merging is OK if the threads that are merged have less than 2 or 3 pages or have a life of less than a day. It is easier to follow that way. I don't see how you could try to merge threads that have many pages of comments or are several days apart. It is too confusing to find your way back through. If there is a thread that has a big page count with a long history & I make a new one of similar subject matter, I think the faster it is merged to the old one the better.

I think it's unecesary..Its like how when my wife neurotically cleans closets when she gets bored....

Vice Lord wrote:

Photo-fish wrote: Merging is OK if the threads that are merged have less than 2 or 3 pages or have a life of less than a day. It is easier to follow that way. I don't see how you could try to merge threads that have many pages of comments or are several days apart. It is too confusing to find your way back through. If there is a thread that has a big page count with a long history & I make a new one of similar subject matter, I think the faster it is merged to the old one the better.

I think it's unecesary..Its like how when my wife neurotically cleans closets when she gets bored....

Can you send her to our house please?????

Sunshine Girl wrote:

Vice Lord wrote:

Photo-fish wrote: Merging is OK if the threads that are merged have less than 2 or 3 pages or have a life of less than a day. It is easier to follow that way. I don't see how you could try to merge threads that have many pages of comments or are several days apart. It is too confusing to find your way back through. If there is a thread that has a big page count with a long history & I make a new one of similar subject matter, I think the faster it is merged to the old one the better.

I think it's unecesary..Its like how when my wife neurotically cleans closets when she gets bored....

Can you send her to our house please?????

Have RockDoc talk to her and she'll start cleaning closets like crazy

































Just kidding

Vice Lord wrote:

Sunshine Girl wrote:

Vice Lord wrote:

Photo-fish wrote: Merging is OK if the threads that are merged have less than 2 or 3 pages or have a life of less than a day. It is easier to follow that way. I don't see how you could try to merge threads that have many pages of comments or are several days apart. It is too confusing to find your way back through. If there is a thread that has a big page count with a long history & I make a new one of similar subject matter, I think the faster it is merged to the old one the better.

I think it's unecesary..Its like how when my wife neurotically cleans closets when she gets bored....

Can you send her to our house please?????

Have RockDoc talk to her and she'll start cleaning closets like crazy

































Just kidding

Can't























stop






















laughing!




















You two crazy kids. I think you feel the same about each other. Either way, that was pretty funny.