I'm from the government and I am here to help you

24 Jan 2016 13:21 #1 by Blazer Bob
www.perishablenews.com/index.php?article=0047878

"U.S. dietary guidelines have long recommended that people steer clear of whole milk, and for decades, Americans have obeyed. Whole milk sales shrunk. It was banned from school lunch programs. Purchases of low-fat dairy climbed.

“Replace whole milk and full-fat milk products with fat-free or low-fat choices,” says the Dietary Guidelines for Americans, the federal government's influential advice book, citing the role of dairy fat in heart disease.

Whether this massive shift in eating habits has made anyone healthier is an open question among scientists, however. In fact, research published in recent years indicates that the opposite might be true: millions might have been better off had they stuck with whole milk."...

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

24 Jan 2016 13:46 - 24 Jan 2016 13:47 #2 by ScienceChic
As with studies "proving one dietary standard", one must be cautious swinging the other way and face-value accepting and changing standards because of new studies just now coming out. Studying effects of one type of food on diet and making correlations to people's health is tough - there are so many variables involved. However, it's great that they are still studying and questioning what is the best diet to recommend. For each individual, that ultimately will vary based on family history and genetics. Thanks for the article BlazerBob!

From the original article:
For decades, the government steered millions away from whole milk. Was that wrong?

But the idea that spurning saturated fat will, by itself, make people healthier has never been fully proven, and in recent years repeated clinical trials and large-scale observational studies have produced evidence to the contrary.

After all the decades of research, it is possible that the key lesson on fats is two-fold. Cutting saturated fats from diets, and replacing them with carbohydrates, as is often done, likely will not reduce heart disease risk. But cutting saturated fats and replacing them with unsaturated fats -- the type of fats characteristic of fish, nuts and vegetable oils -- might.

Some, including representatives of the American Heart Association, disagree. In their view, the evidence for the dangers of saturated fats arises from these two ideas: Consuming saturated fats raises levels of so-called “bad” cholesterol in the blood, and higher levels of “bad” cholesterol, in turn, raise risks of heart disease.

There is a “mountain of evidence” explaining how consumption of saturated fats raises the risk of heart disease, said Penny Kris-Etherton, a nutrition professor at Penn State University and a former member of the Dietary Guidelines advisory committee.


"Now, more than ever, the illusions of division threaten our very existence. We all know the truth: more connects us than separates us. But in times of crisis the wise build bridges, while the foolish build barriers. We must find a way to look after one another as if we were one single tribe.” -King T'Challa, Black Panther

The truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it. ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is. ~Winston Churchill

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

29 Jan 2016 17:24 #3 by Rick
I've been drinking a couple gallons a week for years and it's always been skim. Then I heard about this a few months ago and thought I heard skim wasn't very good for you so I switched back to the fatty stuff. After gaining about 10lbs, I talked to my doc and he just laughed and said that there's nothing wrong with skim, it's just that the whole milk isn't as bad for you as previously thought. So I'm back to chugging skim.

Astrology is for suckers and has no connection to science

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.136 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum
sponsors
© My Mountain Town (new)
Google+