Why States Should Get Tough with Vaccinations

10 Feb 2011 11:45 #1 by ScienceChic
http://www.scientificamerican.com/artic ... nsequences
Fear and Its Consequences: Why States Should Get Tough with Vaccinations
With preventable diseases on the rise, the states should get strict on vaccines
By The Editors | February 10, 2011

California is now in the middle of the worst outbreak of pertussis in half a century. The risk of unprotected exposure to vaccine-preventable diseases is far higher: for example, more than 90 percent of unvaccinated people exposed to measles will become infected.

Vaccine anxiety has been around for as long as there have been vaccines, but the fear of autism originated with a paper published in the Lancet journal in 1998. On the basis of a study of 12 children, author and British medical doctor Andrew Wakefield claimed to have found a link between the measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine and an autismlike disorder. In February 2010 the Lancet retracted Wakefield’s infamous paper. That leaves no scientific evidence to support the assertion that vaccines cause autism or other chronic diseases.

The success of any given vaccine depends on so-called herd immunity, in which a high rate of immunization in a population helps to protect those individuals who are not immune. Herd immunity requires high immunization rates—around 95 percent for highly contagious infections like pertussis and measles. When immunization rates drop below the critical level, disease can strike not only unvaccinated individuals but also vaccinated ones, because all vaccines fail to confer immunity in a certain percentage of people. Parents who opt out are endangering not only their own kids but everybody else’s, too—including those who cannot be vaccinated because they are too young or immunocompromised, as well as youngsters who have received their shots.

Each state has its own immunization requirements for schoolchildren. Yet in 48 states parents may exempt their kids on the basis of religious or philosophical beliefs (only Mississippi and West Virginia disallow exemptions). The right to decide what is best for oneself and one’s children ends where science has so clearly documented a threat to public welfare. It’s time for the other 48 states to eliminate these exemptions and adopt strict enforcement policies to ensure that kids get their jabs. In the interim, doctors need to be patient but firm with fearful parents, explain why vaccines are essential and help restore the public’s faith in science.


"Now, more than ever, the illusions of division threaten our very existence. We all know the truth: more connects us than separates us. But in times of crisis the wise build bridges, while the foolish build barriers. We must find a way to look after one another as if we were one single tribe.” -King T'Challa, Black Panther

The truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it. ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is. ~Winston Churchill

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

10 Feb 2011 15:44 #2 by Grady

Science Chic wrote: www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=fear-and-consequences
Fear and Its Consequences: Why States Should Get Tough with Vaccinations
With preventable diseases on the rise, the states should get strict on vaccines
By The Editors | February 10, 2011

California is now in the middle of the worst outbreak of pertussis in half a century. The risk of unprotected exposure to vaccine-preventable diseases is far higher: for example, more than 90 percent of unvaccinated people exposed to measles will become infected.

Vaccine anxiety has been around for as long as there have been vaccines, but the fear of autism originated with a paper published in the Lancet journal in 1998. On the basis of a study of 12 children, author and British medical doctor Andrew Wakefield claimed to have found a link between the measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine and an autismlike disorder. In February 2010 the Lancet retracted Wakefield’s infamous paper. That leaves no scientific evidence to support the assertion that vaccines cause autism or other chronic diseases.

The success of any given vaccine depends on so-called herd immunity, in which a high rate of immunization in a population helps to protect those individuals who are not immune. Herd immunity requires high immunization rates—around 95 percent for highly contagious infections like pertussis and measles. When immunization rates drop below the critical level, disease can strike not only unvaccinated individuals but also vaccinated ones, because all vaccines fail to confer immunity in a certain percentage of people. Parents who opt out are endangering not only their own kids but everybody else’s, too—including those who cannot be vaccinated because they are too young or immunocompromised, as well as youngsters who have received their shots.

Each state has its own immunization requirements for schoolchildren. Yet in 48 states parents may exempt their kids on the basis of religious or philosophical beliefs (only Mississippi and West Virginia disallow exemptions). The right to decide what is best for oneself and one’s children ends where science has so clearly documented a threat to public welfare. It’s time for the other 48 states to eliminate these exemptions and adopt strict enforcement policies to ensure that kids get their jabs. In the interim, doctors need to be patient but firm with fearful parents, explain why vaccines are essential and help restore the public’s faith in science.


I have to agree I think anybody who does not vaccinate their kids is doing their kids a great dis-service. I know that famous report that tied vaccinations to autism,and has since been discredited several times led many parents to avoiding vaccinations.
I would add that the problem is not just those parents who don’t vaccinate on the basis of religious or philosophical beliefs, but the 20 million plus illegals who come from everywhere and anywhere and may be carrying who knows what pathogens. The illegal population is also a population most likely to not have their children vaccinated.


FYI I re-posted this up on my FB page, SC thanks for posting this.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

10 Feb 2011 16:28 #3 by ScienceChic
I don't know about other countries, but Mexico actually has a very high vaccination rate (I looked this up not too long ago and posted it somewhere here). The state actually monitors households and if the parents don't take their kids to the doctor for their shots, state workers go into their homes and vaccinate them on the spot - no refusals allowed. (People would scream bloody murder and "socialism" here if this was done). It all came about because of diseases continually getting passed back and forth along the border back in the 80's. So, illegals from Mexico are more likely to be vaccinated than our kids are today. And we're supposed to be more advanced...<smacking forehead>

Thanks for putting it on FB - the word needs to be spread! :thumbsup:

"Now, more than ever, the illusions of division threaten our very existence. We all know the truth: more connects us than separates us. But in times of crisis the wise build bridges, while the foolish build barriers. We must find a way to look after one another as if we were one single tribe.” -King T'Challa, Black Panther

The truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it. ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is. ~Winston Churchill

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

10 Feb 2011 17:18 #4 by major bean
Hell, they did not, would not, and will not isolate AIDS carriers and treat it like a communicable disease. Why should immunizations be treated with more enforcement? If more information can suffice for AIDS then more information will suffice for other diseases instead of immunization.

Regards,
Major Bean

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.158 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum
sponsors
© My Mountain Town (new)
Google+