Possibly because it is the same crap. A certain editor, that for some reason feels it necessary to crucify Malinda Spykstra without benefit of a trial, while allowing the actions of a select few LEOs go unchecked or investigated.
Same paper, Same SH**!
It will be nice when Arkansas Valley Publishing Company sends us an editor that covers and investigates news!
AV8OR wrote: Possibly because it is the same crap. A certain editor, that for some reason feels it necessary to crucify Malinda Spykstra without benefit of a trial, while allowing the actions of a select few LEOs go unchecked or investigated.
Same paper, Same SH**!
It will be nice when Arkansas Valley Publishing Company sends us an editor that covers and investigates news!
I viewed the story as an update. This case has been ongoing for sometime.
AV has stood up in public meetings made accusations about a male in a position of trust having sex with an alleged minor (which to date has been shown to have no merit). His outrage has continued into other public forums.
I finding it shocking that AV views the story in the Flume as a crucifixion of the accused party, when the accused was an adult in a position of trust and that has been charged with having a 2 year sexual relationship with a minor. There are real facts in this case that have been reviewed and ruled on by the CO Supreme Court.
One has to wonder if AV somehow knows the accused and this relationship is why he is upset about the story.
Keep posting AV, you are showing your true colors and your real bias.
