Last week, we published a write-up about the budget proposal put forth by the Congressional Progressive Caucus: The People's Budget. It's a great proposal, as it produces a federal surplus by 2021 without cutting services for the poor, the elderly and the middle-class. Instead, it basically just ends the wars, ends the Bush tax cuts, and reduces unemployment. Which, as we saw in the 1990's, is actually about all you need to do to balance the federal budget.
The People's Budget didn't get much media play. In fact, with over 2,000 shares on Facebook, our article was probably the most prominent media write-up it received. However, today comes a nice a surprise—that most serious of serious magazines, The Economist, loves the People's Budget:
CinnamonGirl wrote: The People's Budget. It's a great proposal, as it produces a federal surplus by 2021 without cutting services for the poor, the elderly and the middle-class. Instead, it basically just ends the wars, ends the Bush tax cuts, and reduces unemployment. Which, as we saw in the 1990's, is actually about all you need to do to balance the federal budget.
We can end the wars, yes we can....we can end the Bush tax cuts, yes we can, and then we can reduce unemployment.....uh, how we gonna do that now?
It was always the women, and above all the young ones, who were the most bigoted adherents of the Party, the swallowers of slogans, the amateur spies and nosers−out of unorthodoxy
OmniScience wrote: We've lost billions of dollars on foreign contracts in several countries. BILLIONS ! How do you 'lose' a billion dollars of our tax money?
You might ask Haliburton if they might know where it is.