Should We Go After More Targets in Pakistan?

09 May 2011 09:39 #1 by Nmysys
As Pakistan Backlash Mounts, So Does Opportunity for New Terror Targets

Published May 09, 2011

| FoxNews.com

As Pakistan cries foul over the U.S. raid on Usama bin Laden's compound, President Obama could once again be forced to decide whether to go over the Pakistanis' heads -- or, under their radars -- to capture or kill another high-value terror target.

Evidence from the scene where bin Laden died -- described as the largest intelligence find ever from a senior terror leader -- could lead the United States to other terrorists on Pakistani soil.

With analysts combing through the files for clues on the whereabouts of Al Qaeda's Ayman al-Zawahiri or Taliban chief Mullah Omar, some are calling on Obama to strike while Al Qaeda and its allies are staggering.

"We have no right to keep our troops on the defense dying, when we know where some of the highest-ranking people in the Taliban are," Bing West, former assistant defense secretary, told Fox News on Monday.

Read more:
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/05/09/pakistan-backlash-mounts-does-opportunity-new-terror-targets/#ixzz1Ls0hE0Q3

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

09 May 2011 13:44 #2 by FredHayek
Sure!
Keeping the Taliban ringleaders on the run will slow down the attacks on NATO forces in Afghanistan.

Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

09 May 2011 15:26 #3 by Nmysys
SS109:

Bear in mind that Pakistan is a sovereign Nation and today threatened us if we go in and attack anyone again.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

09 May 2011 15:39 #4 by JMC
The Paki's are a far more serious threat than this piss ants in Iraq and Afghanistan, trillions spent, Not saying attack but lets not foll ourselves.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

09 May 2011 16:06 #5 by Whatevergreen
Nmysys,

Do YOU think we should go after more targets in Pakistan?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

09 May 2011 16:10 #6 by Whatevergreen
I don't think we can trust them anymore. Let's threaten to pull our aid and see if they will be more cooperative. Right now I think they are very embarrassed. They must have had some idea that he was in Pakistan. I say keep up the drone patrols and strikes as needed. Of course with their permission for now. :wink:

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

09 May 2011 16:32 #7 by Rick
We need to get out of that area completely, strengthen our defense and intel, and wait for that whole region to melt down and get overrun with terrorists. Just like Bin Laden, the bad ones will get complacent and let their guards down over time and we can pinpoint their training camps and blast them from the air.

The left is angry because they are now being judged by the content of their character and not by the color of their skin.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

09 May 2011 16:47 #8 by Nmysys
Whatevergreen:

Actually, I think we should go after Terrorists wherever they are, but I still haven't come to grips totally with the Killing of Osama Bin Laden. Still too many unanswered questions to me.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

09 May 2011 17:00 #9 by bailey bud
I think it's a fundamentally bad idea to bomb village after village with mere hearsay evidence.
(not all cases are like this - but it happens enough to be a problem).

It's kind of like the Illinois death penalty problem. There are villages being bombed without good evidence.
(usually drone attacks)

I'd like a pause in the hostilities, simply so the USA can fine-tune its efforts.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.145 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum
sponsors
© My Mountain Town (new)
Google+