Supreme Court gives police leeway in home searches

17 May 2011 09:15 #1 by mtntrekker
how much you want to bet they smell marijuana or hear people scurrying to hide drugs every time they show up at a home?

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld ... 6878.story

Supreme Court gives police leeway in home searches


Reporting from Washington—
The Supreme Court gave police more leeway to break into homes or apartments in search of illegal drugs when they suspect the evidence otherwise might be destroyed.

Ruling in a Kentucky case Monday, the justices said that officers who smell marijuana and loudly knock on the door may break in if they hear sounds that suggest the residents are scurrying to hide the drugs.

bumper sticker - honk if you will pay my mortgage

"The problem with Socialism is that eventually you run out of other people's money." attributed to Margaret Thatcher

"A wise and frugal government, which shall leave men free to regulate their own pursuits of industry and improvement, and shall not take from the mouth of labor the bread it has earned - this is the sum of good government." Thomas Jefferson

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

17 May 2011 09:37 #2 by FredHayek
One more reason to end the War on Drugs? Seems you see more violations of the Constitution than the War on Terror.
What ever happened to getting a warrant? If you arrive late enough in the evening, the druggies will be too stoned to hide the reefer anyway.

Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

17 May 2011 13:24 #3 by cydl
They just keep chippin' away at that Constitution...

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

17 May 2011 13:32 #4 by 2wlady
And now we have a federal court in CA denying CCW permits.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

17 May 2011 13:48 #5 by cydl
Well, election time is approaching...hope we have some folks running who actually take those oath of office words seriously.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

17 May 2011 14:21 #6 by outdoor338

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

17 May 2011 15:09 #7 by FredHayek
I don't know, looks like both sides like to take our freedoms. Ginsburg was the the only dissentor in this case.

Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.139 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum
sponsors
© My Mountain Town (new)
Google+