Climate manipulation.

major bean wrote: I do believe that she is the worst of womanhood. Mean, vindictive, snarky, bitchy. She needs to just shut the hell up.

Honestly MB I really don't know why you dislike Archer so much. I know from personal experience though how two people can just rub each other the wrong way, but you two have never even met.

The Archer "you see" on here I just don't. Granted, I have no knowledge of all of the history of your posts between each other, but I just don't "see" the Archer you do. I see a very level-headed, fair, and not-afraid-to-speak-her-mind woman. There is nothing wrong with that to me.

I had always liked her posts (we see things very similar it seems), but when I met her in person it was different. Instead of liking her, I LOVED HER! She is this little tiny, cute, pixie of a ball of fire. LOL

I have found that people with a strong back-bones sometimes clash more easily than if one person was a bit quieter. You both seem like big personalities which might be why it's easier to have conflicting feelings. But she is NOT the worst of womanhood by any stretch of the imagination, just like I don't think if someone said 'you are the worst of manhood' I would agree with them.

This is just my two cents worth which has been pointed out to me before isn't worth much. :peace:

The big squirt thing looks just unpossible. Evaporation & wind would cause serious loss. How could you possibly try to catch something like that. Think of the scour hole that thing would create when it missed its target.
On a lighter side it would be cool to add chemicals at each transfer station that would change the color of the water from one station to the next. I liked the idea of freezing it into huge missiles and shooting it, for better accuracy.

I have honestly tried to out-post archer and LJ, but it cannot be done. They must ALWAYS have the last word even if the thread went tit-for-tat for 500 posts. I finally had to give up. It cannot be done. There is something very wrong with their personality that they must always have the last word.

And archer is not a very critical thinker. She believes that being described is being called a name. That is strange thinking.
Saying that archer is being bitchy is not the same as saying "archer, you are a bitch!". But she cannot get the distinction.

Photo-fish wrote: The big squirt thing looks just unpossible. Evaporation & wind would cause serious loss. How could you possibly try to catch something like that. Think of the scour hole that thing would create when it missed its target.
On a lighter side it would be cool to add chemicals at each transfer station that would change the color of the water from one station to the next. I liked the idea of freezing it into huge missiles and shooting it, for better accuracy.

PF I read the first line and almost chocked on my drink! My mind is bad I tell you.

Chocked? What are YOU drinking?

major bean wrote: I have honestly tried to out-post archer and LJ, but it cannot be done. They must ALWAYS have the last word even if the thread went tit-for-tat for 500 posts. I finally had to give up. It cannot be done. There is something very wrong with their personality that they must always have the last word.

And archer is not a very critical thinker. She believes that being described is being called a name. That is strange thinking.
Saying that archer is being bitchy is not the same as saying "archer, you are a bitch!". But she cannot get the distinction.

Don't feel too bad. I think I drive my husband crazy sometimes with him thinking I'm trying to have the last word. I don't think I do that, it's just that I have so many words left to say. lol

Photo-fish wrote: Chocked? What are YOU drinking?

:faint: Not enough if seems.

Thank you SG.....your 2 cents means a lot to me. I too don't know why major bean hates me so much, though I do know why I get so ticked off at him. He has tried too many times to shut me up, and well I don't take that kindly. Yes we are political opposites, but I am political opposites with a lot of people and it doesn't escalate like it does with major bean.....well maybe with nmysys sometimes. It's the constant string of demeaning adjectives that are really annoying, that and "shut the hell up". What kind of debate is that.....oh and I'm not sure the man has a sense of humor......I don't deal well with people who are missing the humor gene.

But I appreciate your post, though I doubt it will change anything....I'll just let major bean rant on.

Sunshine Girl wrote:

major bean wrote: I do believe that she is the worst of womanhood. Mean, vindictive, snarky, bitchy. She needs to just shut the hell up.

Honestly MB I really don't know why you dislike Archer so much. I know from personal experience though how two people can just rub each other the wrong way, but you two have never even met.

The Archer "you see" on here I just don't. Granted, I have no knowledge of all of the history of your posts between each other, but I just don't "see" the Archer you do. I see a very level-headed, fair, and not-afraid-to-speak-her-mind woman. There is nothing wrong with that to me.

I had always liked her posts (we see things very similar it seems), but when I met her in person it was different. Instead of liking her, I LOVED HER! She is this little tiny, cute, pixie of a ball of fire. LOL

I have found that people with a strong back-bones sometimes clash more easily than if one person was a bit quieter. You both seem like big personalities which might be why it's easier to have conflicting feelings. But she is NOT the worst of womanhood by any stretch of the imagination, just like I don't think if someone said 'you are the worst of manhood' I would agree with them.

This is just my two cents worth which has been pointed out to me before isn't worth much. :peace:

She drives me nuts. Because she is not a logical person. She will argue one thing at one minute and another thing at another. She holds people to standards to which she refuses to apply to herself. That drives me nuts. She will say that she is not a socialist and then spout socialist ideas in the same thread. She then denies that her socialist ideas are socialist. This drives me nuts. She says that she is a conservative and then demand that taxes be increased for social programs. It drives me nuts. She will ask for sources and say that you are unreasonable for not supplying them, then whenever she is asked for sources, she says that it is unreasonable to ask for sources from her. It drives me nuts.
I loathe that type of flip-flopping, waffling, squashy logic. It drives me nuts.