The decision to allow the North American Gay Amateur Athletic Association (NAGAAA) to enforce a rule of two "straight" players came in a lawsuit filed by three bisexual men who claim they were kicked out of the Gay Softball World Series because they "weren't gay enough," the Courthouse News Service reported.
US District Judge John Coughenour wrote in his ruling, "Plaintiffs have failed to argue that there is a compelling state interest in allowing heterosexuals to play gay softball."
So I am just curious where the ACLU is in this case? And if a regular softball league wanted to limit the number of Gay players on the team to two, would a judge support that and say they weren't 'straight' enough? Or does this discrimination just go one way?
And another question here. Can there be a league called the Heterosexual league? Or would that cause issues? And if not why can they have a 'Gay League'? Just curious where the line is drawn.
The Viking wrote: And another question here. Can there be a league called the Heterosexual league? Or would that cause issues? And if not why can they have a 'Gay League'? Just curious where the line is drawn.
Of course not. A league that allowed only heterosexuals would be 'homophobic' and intolerant.
The "Homo" league will only end up with massive hemroids anyway, eliminating their ability to play, so they won't be around for long. <LOTS OF SARCASM, BUT SOMEWHAT ON TRACK!>
<LOTS OF SARCASM, BUT SOMEWHAT ON TRACK!> 
