House adopts resolution rebuking Obama for Action in Libya

04 Jun 2011 12:16 #11 by archer

CriticalBill wrote: I appreciate your honesty archer, but since you and a whole lot of other Americans strongly disagree with this Libya move, would you not want both sides to protest this action? I would think if this was something you felt strongly about, you would just avoid the topic all together instead of trying to defend Obama in an indirect way. Wrong is wrong, right?


Your convoluted logic won't work I didn't want him to go into Libya, but I believe he had the right to do it without congressional approval, now we are support for NATO....or I think that is what this is being justified as...I don't like it, but I don't think it is illegal. Why would I avoid the topic?. I would like to see the congress spend their time on more productive endeavors than slapping the president's wrist for something that cannot be changed (I don't see us abandoning NATO at this point)

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

05 Jun 2011 08:43 #12 by Rick
So you'll continue to give cover for a policy you disagree with because he's a guy you voted for.

The left is angry because they are now being judged by the content of their character and not by the color of their skin.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

06 Jun 2011 14:11 #13 by FredHayek
So Archer is picking the on the Republicans for not doing anything and when they do pass bills with bipartisan support like this Libyan document, she attacks them? Or how about last week when a bipartisan group voted against raising the debt ceiling?
Sounds much better then when the Republican House passes partisan legislation that has no chance in the Senate? Or when Pelosi's House would pass highly partisan bills instead of hoping to write a bipartisan Obama health care bill?

Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

14 Jun 2011 08:16 #14 by CinnamonGirl
Qaddafi Sends Thank-You Note

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/11/world ... etter.html

Col. Muammar el-Qaddafi has written to members of Congress thanking them for criticizing President Obama last week over his involvement in the NATO-led military campaign in Libya.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

14 Jun 2011 08:24 #15 by ScienceChic
http://www.truth-out.org/war-and-peace- ... 1307724890
On War and Peace, the Senate Starts to Move
Friday 10 June 2011
by: Robert Naiman

Senators are often much harder to move than House members on peace issues, and sometimes people get demoralized. In general, your average senator is much more attached to the Empire than your average member of the House, because senators are much more insulated from public opinion. But when the Senate starts to move - now you got something.

This week, the Senate started to move. Fifteen senators - so far - have signed a bipartisan letter to the president initiated by Sens. Jeff Merkley (D-Oregon), Mike Lee (R-Utah) and Tom Udall (D-New Mexico), urging "strong support for a shift in strategy and the beginning of a sizable and sustained reduction of US military forces in Afghanistan, beginning in July 2011." The letter, including the fifteen signers so far, is here . A group of former military officials is supporting the letter, as well as a coalition of national organizations , including MoveOn and the National Organization for Women.

Meanwhile, on the Libya war, Sens. Jim Webb (D-Virginia) and Bob Corker (R-Tennessee) - both members of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee - have introduced a bipartisan resolution - S.J.Res.18 (not on THOMAS yet, as of this writing, but you can find the text here ) - echoing actions that have been taken by the House, including the Conyers amendment prohibiting the introduction of ground troops, the Garrett amendment affirming that US military operations have not been authorized and the Boehner resolution demanding more information from the president (which never would have happened had it not been necessary to draw support from the sharper resolution introduced by Dennis Kucinich mandating the withdrawal of US forces).

The Webb-Corker bill is pursuing the same idea as the Conyers amendment: constrain the president from unilateral war making with broad, bipartisan action.

If you want your senators to sign on to the Merkley-Lee-Udall letter and the Webb-Corker bill, you should tell them. The Congressional switchboard is 202-225-3121.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=pl ... cizDJKVAMk
June 8, 2011- Sen. Webb Introduces Joint Resolution on Libya Operations

"Now, more than ever, the illusions of division threaten our very existence. We all know the truth: more connects us than separates us. But in times of crisis the wise build bridges, while the foolish build barriers. We must find a way to look after one another as if we were one single tribe.” -King T'Challa, Black Panther

The truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it. ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is. ~Winston Churchill

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.147 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum
sponsors
© My Mountain Town (new)
Google+