U.N. Agreement Should Have All Gun Owners Up In Arms

08 Jun 2011 14:03 #2 by FredHayek
Not too worried about UN agreements. Usually not even worth the paper they are printed on. And if Obama tried to enforce them here, we would have a Republican President in 2012.

Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

08 Jun 2011 14:21 #3 by JMC

Martin Ent Inc wrote: More BS to ponder.

http://blogs.forbes.com/larrybell/2011/ ... p-in-arms/

Sleep well, meaningless.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

08 Jun 2011 15:12 #4 by Pony Soldier

While the terms have yet to be made public, if passed by the U.N. and ratified by our Senate,


You could just quit reading right there. There might be a few in the Senate stupid enough to vote for something like this, but not many.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

08 Jun 2011 15:16 #5 by BearMtnHIB
Then why is the Obama administration agreeing with the damn UN on this?

Why do they waste their time, and our taxpayer money on this crap?

With the right event- they could get it passed. It shows where their heads are at if nothing else- and their heads are not in compliance with our constitution!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

08 Jun 2011 15:24 - 08 Jun 2011 15:25 #6 by LadyJazzer
God, I love this... It makes the rounds about every 5 or 6 months so the gun-nuts can get all worked up and foam at the mouth...

http://www.snopes.com/politics/guns/untreaty.asp

So, I guess the June, 2011, event is done... Can we expect another outbreak around November/December?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

08 Jun 2011 15:25 #7 by JMC

BearMtnHIB wrote: Then why is the Obama administration agreeing with the damn UN on this?

Why do they waste their time, and our taxpayer money on this crap?

With the right event- they could get it passed. It shows where their heads are at if nothing else- and their heads are not in compliance with our constitution!

Get outraged about something real, this is theater.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

08 Jun 2011 18:42 #8 by Martin Ent Inc
Because Hillary said we would comply.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

08 Jun 2011 20:16 #9 by Jekyll
I don't get "foamed up at the mouth" about guns. However, I was RAISED with guns. All the respect and safety and how to use them. I use guns for hunting and target practicing. I also keep them in the closet for home protection and I've never had to use them for that, but they're there. I can't do this? I'm a maniac????? GO FY! Don't tell me what to FU***** do with my firearms!!! Go plant some flowers or somethin'. I've done THAT too! Godda** communists!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

09 Jun 2011 10:07 #10 by bailey bud
I believe in freedom of speech - but not freedom of infringement.

a) Enact tougher regulatory authority licensing requirements, creating additional red tape for regulatory activity.
(a global OIRA)

b) Confiscate and destry unauthorized regulators

c) Ban the trade, sale, and private funding of any regulatory activity that infringes on private living.

d) Create an international regulator registry, setting the stage for full-scale bureaucrat confiscation.


That said - I've worked on a couple of UN initiatives (UNESCO). The UN does an okay job at encouraging economic and social development.

An initiative like this one is total bunk, and a waste of time, money, and oxygen. I think it should be referred to the global warming panel, since it generates enough hot air to melt a dozen endangered icebergs.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.152 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum
sponsors
© My Mountain Town (new)
Google+