Nobody that matters wrote: If that's the best the republicans can muster, I'll be voting 3rd party and we'll all find out how much damage Obama can do in 8 years instead of 4.
As long as we get enough conservatives to the polls to take the Senate out of Democrat hands (likely given that 23 Democrats are up this time around and only 4 seats need to change hands), I don't see Obama as having any more options than Clinton did. Go along to get along and pretend that it was your idea in the hopes that history will be kind to you.
Nobody that matters wrote: If that's the best the republicans can muster, I'll be voting 3rd party and we'll all find out how much damage Obama can do in 8 years instead of 4.
As long as we get enough conservatives to the polls to take the Senate out of Democrat hands (likely given that 23 Democrats are up this time around and only 4 seats need to change hands),
Wow- You're either delusional or the biggest moron here. After Wisconsin, the Ryan Budget and a few other things America is finally waking up to the fact that republicans are nothing but a bunch of corporate whores..
Oh yeah - so delusional that I forgot that Wisconsin citizens, not the public union members - the rest of them, reelected to their Supreme Court a justice more likely to uphold the law than overturn it. Uh-huh, I'm the delusional one between the two of us VL. Got any more of what you're smoking? The regressives lost 6 seats due to ObamaCare in 2010 when a plurality of seats were up for election. This time around the ration is nearly 2:1 and you think Republicans can't get 17% of them when they took away nearly 33% the last time? The only way the regressives hold onto their Senate majority is if the conservatives stay home on election day, and that just isn't going to happen - especially if the national race holds a 3rd party candidate for POTUS. Four seats needed to switch the majority to 51-49 and 6 seats to reverse the current majority 53-47.
Got news for you VL - the voters aren't any happier with ObamaCare now than they were last November and there's a lot more people who voted to cram it down their throat up for election this time around. Bennet managed to hang onto his seat by a measly 1% here in Colorado. Not a lot of independents need to vote for the person running against Udall to give that person a good shot at beating him and then it's only 3 more that need to change hands.
If you want to make some money in Vegas VL, put your money down on a Republican Senate and another 4 years for Obummer.
PrintSmith wrote: Oh yeah - so delusional that I forgot that Wisconsin citizens, not the public union members - the rest of them, reelected to their Supreme Court a justice more likely to uphold the law than overturn it. Uh-huh, I'm the delusional one between the two of us VL. Got any more of what you're smoking? The regressives lost 6 seats due to ObamaCare in 2010 when a plurality of seats were up for election. This time around the ration is nearly 2:1 and you think Republicans can't get 17% of them when they took away nearly 33% the last time? The only way the regressives hold onto their Senate majority is if the conservatives stay home on election day, and that just isn't going to happen - especially if the national race holds a 3rd party candidate for POTUS. Four seats needed to switch the majority to 51-49 and 6 seats to reverse the current majority 53-47.
Got news for you VL - the voters aren't any happier with ObamaCare now than they were last November and there's a lot more people who voted to cram it down their throat up for election this time around. Bennet managed to hang onto his seat by a measly 1% here in Colorado. Not a lot of independents need to vote for the person running against Udall to give that person a good shot at beating him and then it's only 3 more that need to change hands.
If you want to make some money in Vegas VL, put your money down on a Republican Senate and another 4 years for Obummer.
Well how about me and you make a bet....... big talker..?
it's at least a million years old.
