Krauthammer: Following the Elmendorf rule

08 Jul 2011 19:50 #1 by Blazer Bob
Here we go again. An approaching crisis. A looming deadline. Nervous markets. And then, from the miasma of gridlock, rises our president, calling upon those unruly congressional children to quit squabbling, stop kicking the can down the road and get serious about debt.

This from the man who:

• Ignored the debt problem for two years by kicking the can to a commission.

• Promptly ignored the commission's December 2010 report.

• Delivered a State of the Union address in January that didn't even mention the word "debt" until 35 minutes in.

• Delivered in February a budget so embarrassing — it actually increased the deficit — that the Democratic-controlled Senate rejected it 97-0.

• Took a budget mulligan with his April 13 debt-plan speech. Asked in Congress how this new "budget framework" would affect the actual federal budget, Congressional Budget Office Director Doug Elmendorf replied with a devastating "We don't estimate speeches." You can't assign numbers to air.

President Obama assailed the lesser mortals who inhabit Congress for not having seriously dealt with a problem he had not dealt with at all, then scolded Congress for being even less responsible than his own children. They apparently get their homework done on time.

My compliments. But the Republican House did do its homework. It's called a budget. It passed the House on April 15. The Democratic Senate has produced no budget. Not just this year, but for two years running. As for the schoolmaster-in-chief, he produced two 2012 budget facsimiles: The first (February) was a farce and the second (April) was empty, dismissed by the CBO as nothing but words untethered to real numbers.

Obama has run disastrous annual deficits of around $1.5 trillion while insisting for months on a "clean" debt-ceiling increase, i.e., with no budget cuts at all. Yet suddenly he now rises to champion major long-term debt reduction, scorning any suggestions of a short-term debt-limit deal as can-kicking.



Read more: Krauthammer: Following the Elmendorf rule - The Denver Post http://www.denverpost.com/opinion/ci_18 ... z1RZJsgjEP
Read The Denver Post's Terms of Use of its content: http://www.denverpost.com/termsofuse

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

09 Jul 2011 07:58 #2 by Rick
Why ever risk throwing an interception when you can always get away with "hand offs" , take credit when you score, and don't get blamed when there's a fumble.

The left is angry because they are now being judged by the content of their character and not by the color of their skin.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

09 Jul 2011 07:59 #3 by HEARTLESS
Obama, all talk , no action.

The silent majority will be silent no more.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

09 Jul 2011 12:04 #4 by LadyJazzer
Interesting point... I LOVE this one:

"• Delivered a State of the Union address in January that didn't even mention the word "debt" until 35 minutes in."


Wow... Does that mean that if he had mentioned the word "debt" 7 minutes and 12 seconds in, Krauthammer would have been okay with it? How about 2 minutes, 10 seconds? 21 minutes, 3 seconds? Where is the line that would have satisfied him?

Oh, wait...This is Obama we're talking about... The answer is: NOTHING would have satisfied him... :Whistle

Got it....

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.146 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum
sponsors
© My Mountain Town (new)
Google+