So far all I have heard is speculation which sells ads on the Internet for Huffington Post and creates sponsorship for NPR. What is lacking is hard evidence that Fox or any other part of Murdoch's media empire did anything wrong in the USA. So far all what Sen. Rockefeller has done is created speculation, I'm sure he would like to have a reason to create a fishing expedition and go after Fox. However, if they go after Fox they should also go after the New York Times for leaking classified information in the past.
Nobody has "gone after Fox"... But thanks for playing...
What's happened is that a US Senator has suggested that there be an investigation into NewsCorp to ascertain if laws have been broken. That doesn't sound like "speculation" to me... If nothing is found, then no harm, no foul. In the meantime, NewsCorp, and Murdoch, are up to their eyeballs in it over in the UK...
I've never been able to figure out why Righties want to protect tax-cheats... Perhaps you can explain that?
But since legally not paying taxes isn't the issue here...Illegally accessing phone and computer accounts is, I'm not sure I understand this particular version of "They did it too"--since I'm not aware that GE or NBC did anything like NewsCorp did... Perhaps you could enlighten us?
conifermtman wrote: So far all I have heard is speculation which sells ads on the Internet for Huffington Post and creates sponsorship for NPR. What is lacking is hard evidence that Fox or any other part of Murdoch's media empire did anything wrong in the USA. So far all what Sen. Rockefeller has done is created speculation, I'm sure he would like to have a reason to create a fishing expedition and go after Fox. However, if they go after Fox they should also go after the New York Times for leaking classified information in the past.
From the story I quoted,
According to Scotland Yard, Murdoch hacks reportedly bribed mid-level police officers to supply information as well.
So it's apparently a full-on police investigation. That they've done anything here in the US is speculation at this point, and that's why an investigation should be done - is it confined to the UK, or is the parent organization involved in illegal activities here too (especially as millions of emails have been deleted)?
And I agree that if anything comes up about other news stations that they should be investigated too, but is there any evidence that they've done any wrong - just starting an investigation b/c GE took advantage of legal tax loopholes available isn't probable enough cause (I'm all for those being investigated by the IRS and closed!). And you can't investigate them just b/c of perceived bias - that's not illegal (although it is wrong).
"Now, more than ever, the illusions of division threaten our very existence. We all know the truth: more connects us than separates us. But in times of crisis the wise build bridges, while the foolish build barriers. We must find a way to look after one another as if we were one single tribe.” -King T'Challa, Black Panther
The truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it. ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is. ~Winston Churchill
Got to love how the regressives take something that happened across the pond and then attempt to employ the logical fallacy of guilt by association to tarnish others here in America. I keep telling you folks you need to get a new playbook because everyone knows the plays in the one you have.
And isn't it the regressives who have been saying for quite some time we need to be more like England and Europe? This behavior of the English press isn't anything new, there's no such thing as an ethical line in that lot. Come to think of it, the MSM has been patterning themselves after their English counterparts now that you mention it. Abandoning all pretense at neutrality, falsely accusing a sitting president of something based upon some altered documents............fits right in with how the British press corps behaves.