Full Court Press On Murdoch & Fox News? NPR Retracts Story!

14 Jul 2011 12:40 #21 by LadyJazzer
But it gave you a chance to use "regressives" in a sentence!...So, it can't be all bad....

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

14 Jul 2011 12:47 #22 by Something the Dog Said
It appears that the FBI is investigating News corp., the parent company of the Wall Street Journal, Fox News and other tabloids over their hacking into the phones and voice mail of the 9/11 victims.

"Remember to always be yourself. Unless you can be batman. Then always be batman." Unknown

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

14 Jul 2011 12:56 #23 by ScienceChic

PrintSmith wrote: Got to love how the regressives take something that happened across the pond and then attempt to employ the logical fallacy of guilt by association to tarnish others here in America. I keep telling you folks you need to get a new playbook because everyone knows the plays in the one you have.

And isn't it the regressives who have been saying for quite some time we need to be more like England and Europe? This behavior of the English press isn't anything new, there's no such thing as an ethical line in that lot. Come to think of it, the MSM has been patterning themselves after their English counterparts now that you mention it. Abandoning all pretense at neutrality, falsely accusing a sitting president of something based upon some altered documents............fits right in with how the British press corps behaves.

Guilt by association? Dude, it's the same company!

Be more like Europe and England? Where did that come from? I've never said anything like that, I've never seen anyone on this board say anything like that. And when you've heard that are you sure it was in response specifically to being more like their press or are you making broad generalizations and applying it here?

I don't want to make any assumptions as to what you are referring to when you say "falsely accusing a sitting president of something based upon some altered documents" - but can I guess that this is about the Obama birth certificate ridiculousness? If so, look to the blogs and Fox News first for that crap. Last I heard, the MSM was accused of being liberally biased and kissing Obama's ass, not falsely accusing him of anything...

"Now, more than ever, the illusions of division threaten our very existence. We all know the truth: more connects us than separates us. But in times of crisis the wise build bridges, while the foolish build barriers. We must find a way to look after one another as if we were one single tribe.” -King T'Challa, Black Panther

The truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it. ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is. ~Winston Churchill

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

14 Jul 2011 12:57 #24 by LadyJazzer
No, they leave the false accusations to those "fair and balanced" nutjobs on the right....

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

14 Jul 2011 13:19 #25 by LadyJazzer

FBI probes Murdoch empire over 9/11 hacking claims
Earlier, media mogul reverses course, decides to testify in Parliament over scandal


LONDON — The FBI has opened an investigation into allegations that media mogul Rupert Murdoch's News Corp. sought to hack into the phones of Sept. 11 victims, a law enforcement official said Thursday.

The official spoke Thursday to The Associated Press on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to speak publicly.

The FBI's New York office didn't immediately comment Thursday. There was no immediate response to messages left for News Corp. and the U.S. attorney's office in Manhattan.

Some U.S. lawmakers called for an investigation to see if the billionaire's News Corp. had broken American laws while in Australia, where Murdoch was born, the prime minister said her government may review media laws.


http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/43750733/ns ... ws-europe/


Laws were either broken or they weren't... If they were, I'm going to enjoy this immensely....

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

14 Jul 2011 13:30 #26 by HEARTLESS
And if they weren't will you go pound sand and ingest e coli? :biggrin:

The silent majority will be silent no more.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

14 Jul 2011 13:41 #27 by PrintSmith

Science Chic wrote: Guilt by association? Dude, it's the same company!

It's the English press SC. As noted earlier, in the British tabloid world there is no such word as ethics, never has been.

The British press, particularly the tabloids, has a freewheeling history, and some actions that might be considered disreputable in the United States are merely viewed as mischievous, said Archie Bland, foreign editor of The Independent in Britain.

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2011/07/ ... 9214.shtml

Science Chic wrote: Be more like Europe and England? Where did that come from? I've never said anything like that, I've never seen anyone on this board say anything like that. And when you've heard that are you sure it was in response specifically to being more like their press or are you making broad generalizations and applying it here?

You've never seen anyone on this board say our healthcare system should be more like the ones in England and Europe? Really? That's where this whole so called progressive kick came from in the early part of the last century that the Democrats have clutched so strongly to their collectivist chests ever since.

Science Chic wrote: I don't want to make any assumptions as to what you are referring to when you say "falsely accusing a sitting president of something based upon some altered documents" - but can I guess that this is about the Obama birth certificate ridiculousness? If so, look to the blogs and Fox News first for that crap. Last I heard, the MSM was accused of being liberally biased and kissing Obama's ass, not falsely accusing him of anything...

How quickly we forget......

CBS executives lost jobs following a 2004 story questioning President George W. Bush's National Guard service, an episode that eventually led to longtime anchor Rather's unpleasant departure from the network.

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2011/07/ ... 9214.shtml
You remember Dan Rather, don't you SC?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

14 Jul 2011 13:52 #28 by archer
Huh? Are you saying PS that we shouldn't care if Murdoch broke any US laws because Dan Rather lied? I fail to see the logic.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

14 Jul 2011 13:56 #29 by LadyJazzer
And Dan Rather would have exactly WHAT to do with it if laws were broken by Murdoch's company?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

14 Jul 2011 14:03 #30 by Kate
Amazing. Three strawmen arguments in the same post! A new record!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.153 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum
sponsors
© My Mountain Town (new)
Google+