- Posts: 4316
- Thank you received: 30
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
LadyJazzer wrote: Vote out the teabaggers and return to sanity.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
PrintSmith wrote: Yep, right there in Article II, Section 1:
In answer to your question, what can we do, I might suggest working to make sure that consolidationists who seek a dismissal of the progressive form of limited power federal government contained in the Constitution are not elected to federal offices and that advocates of that progressive form of government are elected instead.Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress.......
Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective Numbers, which shall be determined by adding to the whole Number of free Persons, including those bound to Service for a Term of Years, and excluding Indians not taxed, three fifths of all other Persons.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
LadyJazzer wrote:
swampfish wrote:
LadyJazzer wrote: I don't know... Why don't you ask all the conservatives that started this thread by declaring they would never shop Progressive for insurance because it was owned by a leftie? Hoisted on your own petard much?
Indeed, I have been hoisted - but pleasurably so, since you quote Shakespeare. Ladyjazzer, I did not ever think you would read an old dead white philanderer's literature - very impressive, for a lib.
I'm just as impressed that a knuckle-dragging neanderthal teabagger would get the reference... Also impressive.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.