Three Charts to Email to Your Right-Wing Brother-In-Law

29 Aug 2011 18:17 #21 by LOL

jmc wrote: Why can't you ALL admit that whatever party is in charge runs up debt! One for needless war the other for ineffective social programs. So simple.


Yes, that is correct, and that is why a balanced budget amendment is needed, like the states have.

Correlation of government policy with jobs and other economic statistics is not always valid either. There are many other influences on the economy.

If you want to be, press one. If you want not to be, press 2

Republicans are red, democrats are blue, neither of them, gives a flip about you.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

29 Aug 2011 18:22 #22 by JMC

Joe wrote:

jmc wrote: Why can't you ALL admit that whatever party is in charge runs up debt! One for needless war the other for ineffective social programs. So simple.


Yes, that is correct, and that is why a balanced budget amendment is needed, like the states have.

Correlation of government policy with jobs and other economic statistics is not always valid either. There are many other influences on the economy.

Elect the right people and a balanced budget amendment is not needed. For the record it would not be responsible to even pass one. Raise taxes for every war and it might work. The right wants to be the world police but don't want to pay either. The "amendment" is just a gimmick for the ignorant.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

29 Aug 2011 18:30 #23 by LOL
So jmc, would you change the way states and counties operate, and let them borrow money and run deficits?

I agree a national balanced budget would have to be phased in long term, over several decades.

If you want to be, press one. If you want not to be, press 2

Republicans are red, democrats are blue, neither of them, gives a flip about you.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

29 Aug 2011 18:33 #24 by JMC

Joe wrote: So jmc, would you change the way states and counties operate, and let them borrow money and run deficits?

I agree a national balanced budget would have to be phased in long term, over several decades.

We borrow ,when we have unusual circumstances, no big deal if we can pay it back. Not having that ability would be a disaster.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

29 Aug 2011 18:38 #25 by LOL
That is why you have reserves and rainy day funds, which citizens should also have. And there can be specific exceptions for disasters and declared wars.

If you want to be, press one. If you want not to be, press 2

Republicans are red, democrats are blue, neither of them, gives a flip about you.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

29 Aug 2011 18:41 #26 by LadyJazzer
Since Clinton handed off a surplus to Bush, we can see that a Constitutional Amendment wasn't necessary to do it. One is not needed now.

The GOP just needs to learn to pay for their unnecessary wars, their prescription-drug benefits, greasing the palms of their buddies with the no-bid contracts, and allow the government to negotiate for best drug prices instead of propping up their fat-cat buddies in the pharma industry, and their fat-cat buddies in the oil business....

Problem solved... No amendment necessary.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

29 Aug 2011 19:00 #27 by LOL

jmc wrote:

Joe wrote: So jmc, would you change the way states and counties operate, and let them borrow money and run deficits?

I agree a national balanced budget would have to be phased in long term, over several decades.

We borrow ,when we have unusual circumstances, no big deal if we can pay it back. Not having that ability would be a disaster.


You didn't answer the question should states and counties run deficits?

If you want to be, press one. If you want not to be, press 2

Republicans are red, democrats are blue, neither of them, gives a flip about you.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

29 Aug 2011 19:59 #28 by LadyJazzer
It's a ridiculous question since states and counties are not required to raise armies, navies, provide for the defense, start unnecessary wars, continue to fund military bases on foreign soil, sign no-bid contracts for billions with their political friends, provide and maintain interstate highway systems; build infrastructure like the Hoover Dam; build and maintain air-traffic control systems and airports; create federal law enforcement services to protect against terrorism, covert intelligence agencies, etc. Providing foreign aid to our friends.....

Nice try at drawing a meaningless parallel... But that dog won't hunt.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

29 Aug 2011 20:24 #29 by Residenttroll returns
I look the spin by the socialist.....

They are actually justifying Bush's spending in graph #1
Graph #2 is estimates....sort of reminds of the global warming graphs they estimate increases for the next fifty years.
Graph #3 is misrepresents both Obama and Bush's administration and is more reflective of the Democrat party and it's leadership in Congress...again another deception by the left.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

29 Aug 2011 20:29 - 23 Jan 2013 05:35 #30 by LOL
I thought graph #2 was Obama's popularity curve. Now I'm really confused. :)

If you want to be, press one. If you want not to be, press 2

Republicans are red, democrats are blue, neither of them, gives a flip about you.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.158 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum
sponsors
© My Mountain Town (new)
Google+