lionshead2010 wrote: You know the liberals in here are going to have a ball with this stuff when all the conservative bloggers run out of beer and fall asleep.
archer wrote: If the Republicans are determined to give tax breaks to corporations so they will create jobs, how about tying the tax break to the number of jobs added to the payroll. The more employees you hire the greater the tax relief. That way the tax cut actually goes to creating jobs, not to investors and bigger management salaries. It would have to be based on a percentage of employees, so small businesses woulr get a break too.
"If you go to the US Government Printing Office ( [url=http://www.gpo.gov" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;]http://www.gpo.gov[/url] ), you can order a complete set of Title 26 of the US Code of Federal Regulations (that's the part written by the IRS), all twenty volumes of it, at the bargain price of $974, shipping included.
According to the US Government Printing Office, it's 13,458 pages in total. The full text of Title 26 of the United States Code (the part written by Congress--available for an additional $179) is a mere 3,387 printed pages, bringing the adjusted gross page count to 16,845."
How about if we just tell the federal government to roll back, oh say 13,450 pages of the tax code so businesses can do business instead of chasing after regulatory nonsense? This way we don't have to decide who's going to get what breaks - this way, we ALL get breaks, and the federal government disbands and goes to find REAL jobs in a REAL economy once more, because we're ALL working and we don't have time or patience for government interference.
We make a living by what we get, we make a life by what we give. - Sir Winston Churchill
archer wrote: If the Republicans are determined to give tax breaks to corporations so they will create jobs, how about tying the tax break to the number of jobs added to the payroll. The more employees you hire the greater the tax relief. That way the tax cut actually goes to creating jobs, not to investors and bigger management salaries. It would have to be based on a percentage of employees, so small businesses woulr get a break too.
"If you go to the US Government Printing Office ( [url=http://www.gpo.gov" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;]http://www.gpo.gov[/url] ), you can order a complete set of Title 26 of the US Code of Federal Regulations (that's the part written by the IRS), all twenty volumes of it, at the bargain price of $974, shipping included.
According to the US Government Printing Office, it's 13,458 pages in total. The full text of Title 26 of the United States Code (the part written by Congress--available for an additional $179) is a mere 3,387 printed pages, bringing the adjusted gross page count to 16,845."
How about if we just tell the federal government to roll back, oh say 13,450 pages of the tax code so businesses can do business instead of chasing after regulatory nonsense? This way we don't have to decide who's going to get what breaks - this way, we ALL get breaks, and the federal government disbands and goes to find REAL jobs in a REAL economy once more, because we're ALL working and we don't have time or patience for government interference?
That's freedom in the eyes of socialist....13,450 pages of rules and regulations for the nation's chief confiscation unit.
Pretty sad when the only one on the Left to support Odildo is VL (Vacuous Lunatic).
I also heard on the radio that the combined number for unemployed and under employed (people working in jobs they are over qualified for) is now over 18%, or about 1 in 5 people that are in worse shape than before.
Less than 60% of Americans have jobs, the lowest employment rate since 1983. (Denver Post this morning.) To a certain extent, neither Republicans nor Democrats are to blame, part of it is just a changing world. But I expect to see a decade of very low growth like the 1% we are seeing now. Too bad the population is increasing at 3%. Every year America will get a little more poor per capita.
Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.
