First responders NOT invited to anniversayr of 9-11

06 Sep 2011 10:11 - 06 Sep 2011 10:12 #21 by outdoor338
Democrats playing politics with ailing 9/11 responders

the Democrats’ procedural gimmicks and faulty pay-for system that cost the passage of the James Zagroda 9/11 Health and Compensation Act:

In spite of fierce public opposition, the Democrats’ sizable House majority secured passage of President Barack Obama’s controversial overhaul of the nation’s health care system. But this same majority failed Friday in its efforts to create a popular multi-billion dollar health care fund for emergency responders affected by toxic dust and debris in the wake of the Sept. 11 terrorist attack.

The House leadership had suspended typical procedures—requiring a simple majority—on the James Zadroga 9/11 Health and Compensation Act of 2009 in order to prevent GOP-offered amendments that they feared might compromise the votes of endangered Democrats.Senior Democrats were concerned that Republicans might offer a motion to recommit — sending the bill back to committee with instructions to pay for it with funds from the president’s health care reforms.

The Democrats’ procedural tack meant the bill needed two-thirds majority to pass — a large coalition that senior Democrats surely knew was untenable.[…]

Mired in political quicksand, with many of the caucus’s most senior members facing tough re-election battles, congressional Democrats have become increasingly aware that their many legislative victories are not enough to sour voters’ new taste for Republicans.

Another legislative win would have a negligible effect on what most political handicappers predict will be a Democratic-hostile election. What Democrats needed, and found in the bill’s failure, was the ideal opportunity for a thunderous rebuke of Republicans: An ideological win that would capture the interest and anger of the nation still lingering from Sept. 11.

http://www.redstate.com/jrichardson/201 ... esponders/

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

06 Sep 2011 10:12 #22 by UNDER MODERATION
Replied by UNDER MODERATION on topic First responders NOT invited to anniversayr of 9-11

Martin Ent Inc wrote: :woo hoo:
Clueless Again.



Oh..You know I meant 2002..I got the eleven part mixed up with the date in my head..I fixed it..

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

06 Sep 2011 10:17 #23 by UNDER MODERATION
Replied by UNDER MODERATION on topic First responders NOT invited to anniversayr of 9-11
Its like you "guys" love to wallow in this sh**. We were in NYC last year- How about people who have kids that weren't even born on 911 bringing them to the site and shoving this crap down thier throats?..Scareing thier kids to make sure they hate Arabs too

Its a sick country

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

06 Sep 2011 10:39 #24 by Martin Ent Inc
Think you better read the timeline for payments accepted, and how many didn't take it. Your not in the right year yet.

http://www.historycommons.org/timeline. ... 1_timeline

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

06 Sep 2011 10:43 #25 by UNDER MODERATION
Replied by UNDER MODERATION on topic First responders NOT invited to anniversayr of 9-11

Martin Ent Inc wrote: Think you better read the timeline for payments accepted, and how many didn't take it. Your not in the right year yet.

http://www.historycommons.org/timeline. ... 1_timeline


Whatever..It was about a year after 911....And I know a flight attendant who was'nt even working that day that got a 400k from the 911 fund because she was too scared to fly again...She deserved it in my opinion, but lets not act like these 911 widows are the first people to ever lose thier spouses, ok?

A lot of people got rich from 911

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

06 Sep 2011 10:48 #26 by UNDER MODERATION
Replied by UNDER MODERATION on topic First responders NOT invited to anniversayr of 9-11

Martin Ent Inc wrote: Think you better read the timeline for payments accepted, and how many didn't take it. Your not in the right year yet.

http://www.historycommons.org/timeline. ... 1_timeline



Thanks to the union, Police and Fireman in New York have 5 figure "death on the job" life insurance policies, and everyone who was working when they died in the towers got New Yorks (a workers paradise) maximun Workman Comp survivor payouts, social security and i'm sure many of them had private life insurance policies as well....

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

06 Sep 2011 10:58 #27 by Martin Ent Inc
NO one got a settlement in 02. Many refused it because of the no lawsuit contract they were to sign. No one was partying at the pool with blood money in 02, or 03.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

06 Sep 2011 11:09 #28 by UNDER MODERATION
Replied by UNDER MODERATION on topic First responders NOT invited to anniversayr of 9-11

Martin Ent Inc wrote: NO one got a settlement in 02. Many refused it because of the no lawsuit contract they were to sign. No one was partying at the pool with blood money in 02, or 03.



Did you read what I JUST wrote?..If I died tommarow, my wife would get 700k next week. The 911 widows got that, plus millions more whenever

Best thing that ever happened for most of them

AND STAY ON TOPIC GODAMIT

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

06 Sep 2011 11:11 #29 by Martin Ent Inc
It's MY TOPIC. I am on it your the idiot that has once again strayed from the topic,,, which you know nothing about.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

06 Sep 2011 11:15 #30 by UNDER MODERATION
Replied by UNDER MODERATION on topic First responders NOT invited to anniversayr of 9-11
Oh, yeah

Sorry

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.162 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum
sponsors
© My Mountain Town (new)
Google+