Public schools are "helping" in that regard and not just being anti-gun, the whole myth of global warming has too many kids convinced that the world is rapidly coming to an end because of man made pollution. The last time I fired up the chainsaw to cut down some trees my niece told me I was "committing a crime against nature." My brother and his wife never put that thought in her mind, when I asked her why she thought that I was doing something wrong she told me "my teacher says it's bad to cut down trees and worse to use tools that make pollution."
I can explain it to you but I can't understand it for you.
"Any man who thinks he can be happy and prosperous by letting the Government take care of him; better take a closer look at the American Indian." - Henry Ford
Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges; When the Republic is at its most corrupt the laws are most numerous. - Publius Cornelius Tacitus
There's a big difference between losing sight of the big picture that cutting down one tree, that is a renewable resource if not over-harvested, with a chainsaw that adds a miniscule amount of pollution, to ignoring the accumulated evidence that supports global warming otis. Everything is fine if done in moderation, and renewable resources used wisely and conscientiously; the problem occurs when that tips into excess, which with the growth of the human population, and our wastefulness and unthinking abuse of resources, is definitely occurring.
The world isn't rapidly coming to an end, it's just going to be rapidly, on a geologic time-scale, be altering to something radically different from what we've been used to for the last 11,000 years, more to our detriment moreso than the planet's itself. But it often takes too long to impart that message, and thanks to people's short attention spans, it gets shortened to a crappy soundbite of "we only have to worry about CO2" when in fact we have to worry about CO2, H2O, methane, and a whole host of other GHGs, or "humans only are causing climate change", not "human contributions to climate change are acting in addition to, and over-riding, natural causes of climate change, which is of course still occurring".
Look, I'll bet your eyes are glazing over already aren't they?!
"Now, more than ever, the illusions of division threaten our very existence. We all know the truth: more connects us than separates us. But in times of crisis the wise build bridges, while the foolish build barriers. We must find a way to look after one another as if we were one single tribe.” -King T'Challa, Black Panther
The truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it. ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is. ~Winston Churchill
Science Chic wrote: Look, I'll bet your eyes are glazing over already aren't they?!
Your message isn't lost on me, I am all about conservation because being wasteful costs me money and to me it is wrong on a moral level that I will not tolerate. On the other hand, why should a ten year old child be indoctrinated in a public school to the point that she feels militant about watching me cut down trees that need to come down? I am a big fan of education, but scaring kids with Algore films and "the sky is falling" messages stick in my craw. I know younger kids don't have the capacity to know all there is to know on climate change, heck I don't either but let's be honest with each other, at best we have accurate records about the climate for about 200 years and the oldest data is suspect.
I can explain it to you but I can't understand it for you.
"Any man who thinks he can be happy and prosperous by letting the Government take care of him; better take a closer look at the American Indian." - Henry Ford
Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges; When the Republic is at its most corrupt the laws are most numerous. - Publius Cornelius Tacitus
I agree - the correct message gets distorted and common sense gets lost all too quickly. No, kids should not be "indoctrinated", rather they should be taught critical thinking and the strengths and weaknesses of the current data at an appropriate age.
Just because we didn't have thermometers doesn't mean that earlier data is suspect, it merely means that the confidence interval isn't as tight and any extrapolations based on that data must be made with more care.
"Now, more than ever, the illusions of division threaten our very existence. We all know the truth: more connects us than separates us. But in times of crisis the wise build bridges, while the foolish build barriers. We must find a way to look after one another as if we were one single tribe.” -King T'Challa, Black Panther
The truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it. ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is. ~Winston Churchill
This is part of a movement to demonize firearms. If you can start early- with subtle messages like a nerf gun is evil and worthy of trading in for a slice of pizza, you can easily convince them later that a real gun of any kind is a bad thing.
We played cowboys and indians as kids with pop guns, but my grandfather showed me how to shoot a real shotgun when I was 5 or 6. He taught me firearm safety and that a real gun is not a toy to be played with.
Kids these days are taught to fear guns- that they are evil and that they should be traded away for a slice of pizza. How hard will it be to convince them later in life to trade away our rights to them altogether?