Supreme Court to Take Up 'Stolen Valor Act'

18 Oct 2011 09:24 #1 by Wayne Harrison
The Supreme Court will decide whether a law making it a crime to lie about having received military medals is constitutional.

The justices said Monday they will consider the validity of the Stolen Valor Act, which passed Congress with overwhelming support in 2006. The federal appeals court in California struck down the law on free speech grounds and another appeals court in Colorado is considering a separate case.

The Obama administration is arguing that the law is reasonable because it only applies to instances in which the speaker intends to portray himself as a medal recipient. Previous high court rulings also have limited First Amendment protection for false statements.

The court almost always reviews lower court rulings that hold federal laws unconstitutional.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/10 ... valor-act/

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

18 Oct 2011 09:50 #2 by FredHayek
Is lying free speech? I guess so, politico's get away with it all the time.

"I will shut down Gitmo."
"No new taxes, read my lips."
"If we pass this spending bill, unemployment will go down."

Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

18 Oct 2011 09:57 #3 by Wayne Harrison
If we locked up everyone who lied, there'd be no one left to run the country or post on this board.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

18 Oct 2011 11:45 #4 by PrintSmith
Why should it be any more acceptable, or legal, to represent yourself falsely as a former decorated member of the armed services than it is to represent yourself falsely as a police officer, a doctor or a lawyer?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

18 Oct 2011 11:56 #5 by Wayne Harrison
You mean as a FORMER police officer, doctor or lawyer?

Why should it be more unacceptable, or illegal, to represent yourself falsely as a former decorated member of the armed servies than to represent yourself as a former college graduate, former firefighter or former librarian?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

18 Oct 2011 12:07 #6 by PrintSmith
The purpose of the act of representing yourself as a decorated veteran when you are not one is to commit fraud from which you will hopefully derive personal benefit. It is not a substantially different form of fraud than telling people that you have cancer in the hopes that they will provide you with something of value when you don't have cancer.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

18 Oct 2011 14:25 #7 by JMC
Prosecute for fraud, not lying.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

18 Oct 2011 14:43 #8 by Nmysys
Why should it be acceptable to be a journalist and make the news instead of reporting it?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.146 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum
sponsors
© My Mountain Town (new)
Google+