Herman Cain and his electric border fence

19 Oct 2011 12:35 #11 by Wayne Harrison
Do you want to put machine gunners on the Mexican border?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

19 Oct 2011 13:29 #12 by BearMtnHIB

Do you want to put machine gunners on the Mexican border?


Hey wayne- who cuts your hair?

Lets try the electric fence first- if that dosn't work we can go with your idea of putting machine guns on the border OK?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

19 Oct 2011 15:09 #13 by Wayne Harrison
You lack at reading comprehension if you think

"Do you want to put machine gunners on the Mexican border?" means it's my idea. I was responding to your mention of machine guns on the Berlin Wall:

BearMtnHIB wrote: those machine guns were an effective deterrent.


Try to keep up with your own points.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

19 Oct 2011 15:20 #14 by BearMtnHIB
I was talking about the berlin wall.....

Hey- your the one who mentioned putting them on the mexican border- don't try to credit me with your idea.

That was YOUR idea.
So who cuts your hair?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

19 Oct 2011 15:22 #15 by JMC
Ron Paul made a very good point, if you whacks get in control, I don't want a fence to keep me in!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

19 Oct 2011 15:22 #16 by FredHayek

Conservation Voice wrote: Did the Berlin Wall and deadly force stop East Germans from trying to cross?


The East Germans were trying to keep people in, we are trying to keep people out. Didn't work too well with the Great Wall of China, but they didn't have machine guns or electric fences back then.

How about mines? Not lethal, just loaded up with permanent green dye so Migra would know who to arrest. You could also set up sharpshooters with green dye paintball guns too.

Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

19 Oct 2011 15:25 #17 by FredHayek

jmc wrote: Ron Paul made a very good point, if you whacks get in control, I don't want a fence to keep me in!


You forgot to leave in 2000, the Supreme Court had stole the election and Republicans dominated the House and had majority rule in the Senate and guess what? Seniors got to keep their Social Security and the millions of lower income people were taken off the tax roles when Bush got his tax cuts. Obama and Clinton couldn't do that.

Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

19 Oct 2011 15:28 #18 by JMC

SS109 wrote:

Conservation Voice wrote: Did the Berlin Wall and deadly force stop East Germans from trying to cross?


The East Germans were trying to keep people in, we are trying to keep people out. Didn't work too well with the Great Wall of China, but they didn't have machine guns or electric fences back then.

How about mines? Not lethal, just loaded up with permanent green dye so Migra would know who to arrest. You could also set up sharpshooters with green dye paintball guns too.

Fences work both ways, genius! Maybe the left will force the "job producers" to stay in the U.S. Then what. You job creators may have to keep the jobs in this country.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

19 Oct 2011 15:30 #19 by JMC

SS109 wrote:

jmc wrote: Ron Paul made a very good point, if you whacks get in control, I don't want a fence to keep me in!


You forgot to leave in 2000, the Supreme Court had stole the election and Republicans dominated the House and had majority rule in the Senate and guess what? Seniors got to keep their Social Security and the millions of lower income people were taken off the tax roles when Bush got his tax cuts. Obama and Clinton couldn't do that.

Well., Bozo I actually sided with Bush in 2000 as the legit winner. Shove your stereotype up your ass. Been great ever since ? right? I'm glad you liked Bush's 8 years. Loner.
I'm confused by your leap of logic, You think the federal gov. should have less power but think it should build an electric fence and set up machine gunners to shoot whoever gets close. You give this Gov. that you don't trust a lick, with that power? You guys crack me up. Power freaks with a paranoid streak!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

19 Oct 2011 16:01 #20 by FredHayek

jmc wrote:

SS109 wrote:

jmc wrote: Ron Paul made a very good point, if you whacks get in control, I don't want a fence to keep me in!


You forgot to leave in 2000, the Supreme Court had stole the election and Republicans dominated the House and had majority rule in the Senate and guess what? Seniors got to keep their Social Security and the millions of lower income people were taken off the tax roles when Bush got his tax cuts. Obama and Clinton couldn't do that.

Well., Bozo I actually sided with Bush in 2000 as the legit winner. Shove your stereotype up your ass. Been great ever since ? right? I'm glad you liked Bush's 8 years. Loner.
I'm confused by your leap of logic, You think the federal gov. should have less power but think it should build an electric fence and set up machine gunners to shoot whoever gets close. You give this Gov. that you don't trust a lick, with that power? You guys crack me up. Power freaks with a paranoid streak!


Actually I was just having some fun with this post. I think a huge electric fence would be very expensive to build, expensive to maintain and patrol, you would need at least 50,000 men, and easy to tunnel under or climb over especially if the Mexico side likes having their people coming north and sending money home.
Easier to make the US inhospitable to illegal aliens by denying them jobs and fining employers who hire them.

Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.152 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum
sponsors
© My Mountain Town (new)
Google+