This could be really bad for Cain.

The Viking wrote:

Soulshiner wrote:

The Viking wrote: It is sad how the Republican Party USE to be the party of morals. It was important in judging a candidates character when deciding in who to vote for. Now it seems like so many Republican voters are just like the Dems. Who cares about their past and their character, just vote for whoever promises the most. Sad.....

I don't think either party can claim to be the party of morals.

I haven't heard any moral issues about Perry, Bachmann, Santorum, or Romney.

Perry owning " Niggerland ranch" is not an issue for you? It is 2011.

By Katrina Trinko
The Cain campaign just sent out this statement:

As Ms. Sharon Bialek has placed herself in the public spotlight through making patently false allegations against Herman Cain, it is only fair to compare her track record alongside Mr. Cain’s.

In stark contrast to Mr. Cain’s four decades spent climbing the corporate ladder rising to the level of CEO at multiple successful business enterprises, Ms. Bialek has taken a far different path.

The fact is that Ms. Bialek has had a long and troubled history, from the courts to personal finances – which may help explain why she has come forward 14 years after an alleged incident with Mr. Cain, powered by celebrity attorney and long term Democrat donor Gloria Allred.

In the courts, Ms. Bialek has had a lengthy record in the Cook County Court system over various civil lawsuits. The following cases on file in Cook County are:

· 2000-M1-707461 Defendant against Broadcare Management

· 2000-M1-714398 Defendant in lawsuit against Broadcare Management

· 2000-M1-701522 Defendant in lawsuit against Broadcare Management

· 2005-M1-111072 Defendant in lawsuit against Mr. Mark Beatovic.

· 2007-M1-189176 Defendant in lawsuit against Midland Funding.

· 2009-M1-158826 Defendant in lawsuit against Illinois Lending.

Ms. Bialek was also sued in 1999 over a paternity matter according to ABC 7 Chicago (WLS-TV). Source: WLS-TV, November 7, 2011

In personal finances, PACER (Federal Court) records show that Ms. Bialek has filed for bankruptcy in the Northern District of Illinois bankruptcy court in 1991 and 2001. The respective case numbers according to the PACER system are 1:01-bk-22664 and 1:91-bk-23273.

Ms. Bialek has worked for nine employers over the last seventeen years. Source: WLS-TV, November 7, 2011

Curiously, if Ms. Bialek had intended to take legal action, the statute of limitations would have passed a decade ago.

Which brings up the question of why she would make such reprehensible statements now?

The questions should be – who is financing her legal team, have any media agreed to pay for her story, and has she been offered employment for taking these actions?

http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/28 ... ina-trinko

jmc wrote:

The Viking wrote:

Soulshiner wrote:

The Viking wrote: It is sad how the Republican Party USE to be the party of morals. It was important in judging a candidates character when deciding in who to vote for. Now it seems like so many Republican voters are just like the Dems. Who cares about their past and their character, just vote for whoever promises the most. Sad.....

I don't think either party can claim to be the party of morals.

I haven't heard any moral issues about Perry, Bachmann, Santorum, or Romney.

Perry owning " Niggerland ranch" is not an issue for you? It is 2011.

You really need to read. Number one he didn't name it. Number two it is not Niggerland! Niggerhead which is a loggers term for a smooth arge round rock that can cause damage to the underside of a truck.

The Viking wrote:

jmc wrote:

The Viking wrote:

Soulshiner wrote:

The Viking wrote: It is sad how the Republican Party USE to be the party of morals. It was important in judging a candidates character when deciding in who to vote for. Now it seems like so many Republican voters are just like the Dems. Who cares about their past and their character, just vote for whoever promises the most. Sad.....

I don't think either party can claim to be the party of morals.

I haven't heard any moral issues about Perry, Bachmann, Santorum, or Romney.

Perry owning " Niggerland ranch" is not an issue for you? It is 2011.

You really need to read. Number one he didn't name it. Number two it is not Niggerland! Niggerhead which is a loggers term for a smooth arge round rock that can cause damage to the underside of a truck.

If you say so! LOL

neptunechimney wrote: By Katrina Trinko
The Cain campaign just sent out this statement:

As Ms. Sharon Bialek has placed herself in the public spotlight through making patently false allegations against Herman Cain, it is only fair to compare her track record alongside Mr. Cain’s.

In stark contrast to Mr. Cain’s four decades spent climbing the corporate ladder rising to the level of CEO at multiple successful business enterprises, Ms. Bialek has taken a far different path.

The fact is that Ms. Bialek has had a long and troubled history, from the courts to personal finances – which may help explain why she has come forward 14 years after an alleged incident with Mr. Cain, powered by celebrity attorney and long term Democrat donor Gloria Allred.

In the courts, Ms. Bialek has had a lengthy record in the Cook County Court system over various civil lawsuits. The following cases on file in Cook County are:

· 2000-M1-707461 Defendant against Broadcare Management

· 2000-M1-714398 Defendant in lawsuit against Broadcare Management

· 2000-M1-701522 Defendant in lawsuit against Broadcare Management

· 2005-M1-111072 Defendant in lawsuit against Mr. Mark Beatovic.

· 2007-M1-189176 Defendant in lawsuit against Midland Funding.

· 2009-M1-158826 Defendant in lawsuit against Illinois Lending.

Ms. Bialek was also sued in 1999 over a paternity matter according to ABC 7 Chicago (WLS-TV). Source: WLS-TV, November 7, 2011

In personal finances, PACER (Federal Court) records show that Ms. Bialek has filed for bankruptcy in the Northern District of Illinois bankruptcy court in 1991 and 2001. The respective case numbers according to the PACER system are 1:01-bk-22664 and 1:91-bk-23273.

Ms. Bialek has worked for nine employers over the last seventeen years. Source: WLS-TV, November 7, 2011

Curiously, if Ms. Bialek had intended to take legal action, the statute of limitations would have passed a decade ago.

Which brings up the question of why she would make such reprehensible statements now?

The questions should be – who is financing her legal team, have any media agreed to pay for her story, and has she been offered employment for taking these actions?

http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/28 ... ina-trinko

Wow! She doesn't sound like the best witness against Cain. They say she is a Republican, but which one is she working for, Perry?

Wow, bringing up working for nine employers in the past 17 years. they are really scraping the bottom of the barrel. I'm sure there are millions of workers with the same record. This incident happened while she was trying to get a job with Cain.

The answer to why she is bringing up what happened 14 years ago now is that Cain has been accused but none of the first women have come forward publicly. She wants to show the incidents were no isolated. I fully expect more women to come forward. If Cain did these things, I think it probably happened a lot.

Conservation Voice wrote: Wow, bringing up working for nine employers in the past 17 years. they are really scraping the bottom of the barrel. I'm sure there are millions of workers with the same record. This incident happened while she was trying to get a job with Cain.

The answer to why she is bringing up what happened 14 years ago now is that Cain has been accused but none of the first women have come forward publicly. She wants to show the incidents were no isolated. I fully expect more women to come forward. If Cain did these things, I think it probably happened a lot.

I suppose she would be #1 on your list if you were hiring someone for a job, right? Myriad lawsuits and employers, she most likely has a wealth of experience and is a real stable individual. lol

9 Employers in 17 years- this "woman" can't hold a job! She seems to have a history of litigation against employers too.

I wouldn't hire her for anything. No way! I find it disingenuous that she wants to cry about being hit on by Cain.

And I think we are missing the point here- this wench was un-employed when this "so called" event happened. I got news for her- Cain did not break any laws by hitting on her, it's not against the law to touch a female and ask for sex. Are all of us men going to accept this - we can no longer hit on women?

She went to dinner and drinks with him- he paid for her hotel room! Sounds to me like this bitch let Herman buy all this stuff and then she wouldn't put out.

If you are a supervisor or high level executive- you can not hit your employee's up for sex- that is the only situation where a law exists. All other women are fair game. This woman was fair game.

The other women were also supposedly "ex-employees" as well. Their complaints came after they lost their jobs. Therefore- they all had motive to complain about Cain. They all made money by complaining.

I don't believe any of it- I give Cain the benefit of the doudt.

This is a frame job- plain and simple.

Standard dem MO.

Not surprising a conservative would think that unwanted sexual advances on a woman are just A-OK. It can be viewed as sexual assault depending on the circumstances.