Republican voters support GHG cuts, why doesn't their party?

31 Oct 2011 08:53 #1 by Photo-fish
Public polling of Republican voters reveals 71% support EPA's efforts
to cut greenhouse gas emissions. So why is their party trying to gut
the agency and the air law?

Using a smokescreen of saving or creating jobs, this is Trojan Horse-ing around, presenting something that looks attractive on the surface, but which at its core is destructive to health and many lives.

While many polluters push any opportunity to reduce their own costs, the cost of dirty air gets passed to the rest of us through increased incidence of respiratory diseases like asthma, as well as cancers, and increases in the cost of health insurance for everyone.
http://www.startribune.com/opinion/otherviews/132279383.html

http://www.nationaljournal.com/energy/house-passes-bill-to-delay-epa-clean-air-rules-20110923

´¯`•.. ><((((º>`•´¯`•...¸><((((º> ´¯`•.. ><((((º>`´¯`•...¸><((((º>´¯`•.. ><((((º>`•´¯`•...¸><((((º> ´¯`•.. ><((((º>`•.´¯`•...¸><((((º>

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

31 Oct 2011 08:58 #2 by FredHayek
Did they ask these same voters would you still agree to the GHG cuts if it meant your already high utility bills would increase, I am betting support would decline.

Besides, both Romney and Gingrich have supported greenhouse gas measures, but that was before the Obama depression and the worst economy in 70 years.

Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

31 Oct 2011 10:33 #3 by Nmysys
The main problem and obstacle to the creation of jobs in this country stems from the over-regulating of the EPA and other Government agencies.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

31 Oct 2011 11:37 #4 by Photo-fish
The economy as a whole doesn’t employ fewer people as a result of regulation.

U.S. Labor Department statistics show the impact of regulations on layoffs and job creation has been small.

Of the 7,247 mass layoffs last year -- those involving at least 50 workers -- 18 were the result of government regulation, according to department data. Of the 3,114 mass layoffs in the first half of this year, 11 were related to government regulation. By comparison, 1,053 mass layoffs were attributed to business demand.

´¯`•.. ><((((º>`•´¯`•...¸><((((º> ´¯`•.. ><((((º>`´¯`•...¸><((((º>´¯`•.. ><((((º>`•´¯`•...¸><((((º> ´¯`•.. ><((((º>`•.´¯`•...¸><((((º>

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

31 Oct 2011 11:46 #5 by HEARTLESS
How is this for an answer, we don't need more government regulations and employees to enforce them?

The silent majority will be silent no more.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

31 Oct 2011 12:04 #6 by Photo-fish
Yes, government regulators like the EPA are killing good jobs like pelican scrubber and next-of-kin caller.

´¯`•.. ><((((º>`•´¯`•...¸><((((º> ´¯`•.. ><((((º>`´¯`•...¸><((((º>´¯`•.. ><((((º>`•´¯`•...¸><((((º> ´¯`•.. ><((((º>`•.´¯`•...¸><((((º>

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

31 Oct 2011 12:17 #7 by HEARTLESS

Photo-fish wrote: Yes, government regulators like the EPA are killing good jobs like pelican scrubber and next-of-kin caller.

You can scrub your own pelican, but I don't need any help. :lol:
On a slightly more serious note, what do those jobs have to due with Green House Gases?

The silent majority will be silent no more.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

31 Oct 2011 12:27 #8 by HEARTLESS
Before we discuss birds killed by oil spills vs wind farms, answer this question, why are Green Energy unintended consequences okay, but not petroleum based ones?

The silent majority will be silent no more.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

31 Oct 2011 14:21 #9 by HEARTLESS
Let me make the question clearer, why do the oil companies pay the $10,000/day fines imposed by the EPA, but there aren't similar fines for the wind farms? If you are for truth and not subsidizing businesses, we can fine every business that produces electricity until no one can afford it anymore.

The silent majority will be silent no more.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

31 Oct 2011 14:56 #10 by Photo-fish
In July 2009, the Oregon based electric utility PacifiCorp paid $1.4 million in fines for killing eagles in Wyoming. OSHA Proposes $92,000 Fine for LM Wind Power After Worker Killed. Outland Renewable Services faces penalties of $378,000. Minnesota wind energy firm faces $378,000 fine.

´¯`•.. ><((((º>`•´¯`•...¸><((((º> ´¯`•.. ><((((º>`´¯`•...¸><((((º>´¯`•.. ><((((º>`•´¯`•...¸><((((º> ´¯`•.. ><((((º>`•.´¯`•...¸><((((º>

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.145 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum
sponsors
© My Mountain Town (new)
Google+