- Posts: 6722
- Thank you received: 72
HEARTLESS wrote: A few more things about Darwinism. Why with the extensive fossil record can't we find the progression from one species to the next, hint: missing link. Since most fossils prove species extinction, not evolution, where did we come from?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Conservation Voice wrote:
HEARTLESS wrote: A few more things about Darwinism. Why with the extensive fossil record can't we find the progression from one species to the next, hint: missing link. Since most fossils prove species extinction, not evolution, where did we come from?
We came from monkeys. Notice the similarities, both in anatomy and DNA? The fossil records indicate a split between 5 and 7 million years ago.
I'm not convinced we're the end of the line, either.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Topic Author
Dr Philban wrote:
Conservation Voice wrote:
HEARTLESS wrote: A few more things about Darwinism. Why with the extensive fossil record can't we find the progression from one species to the next, hint: missing link. Since most fossils prove species extinction, not evolution, where did we come from?
We came from monkeys. Notice the similarities, both in anatomy and DNA? The fossil records indicate a split between 5 and 7 million years ago.
I'm not convinced we're the end of the line, either.
Except for a few dead ends like Lucy Luckless.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.