David Axelrod's pattern of sexual misbehavior

10 Nov 2011 14:49 #1 by outdoor338
Herman Cain has spent his life living and working all over the country -- Indiana, Georgia, Minnesota, Nebraska, Kansas, Washington, D.C. -- but never in Chicago.

So it's curious that all the sexual harassment allegations against Cain emanate from Chicago: home of the Daley machine and Obama consigliere David Axelrod.

Suspicions had already fallen on Sheila O'Grady, who is close with David Axelrod and went straight from being former Chicago mayor Richard M. Daley's chief of staff to president of the Illinois Restaurant Association (IRA), as being the person who dug up Herman Cain's personnel records from the National Restaurant Association (NRA).

The Daley-controlled IRA works hand-in-glove with the NRA. And strangely enough, Cain's short, three-year tenure at the NRA is evidently the only period in his decades-long career during which he's alleged to have been a sexual predator.

After O'Grady's name surfaced in connection with the miraculous appearance of Cain's personnel files from the NRA, she issued a Clintonesque denial of any involvement in producing them -- by vigorously denying that she knew Cain when he was at the NRA. (Duh.)

And now, after a week of conservative eye-rolling over unspecified, anonymous accusations against Cain, we've suddenly got very specific sexual assault allegations from an all-new accuser out of ... Chicago.

Herman Cain has never lived in Chicago. But you know who has? David Axelrod! And guess who lived in Axelrod's very building? Right again: Cain's latest accuser, Sharon Bialek.

Bialek's accusations were certainly specific. But they also demonstrated why anonymous accusations are worthless.

Within 24 hours of Bialek's press conference, friends and acquaintances of hers stepped forward to say that she's a "gold-digger," that she was constantly in financial trouble -- having filed for personal bankruptcy twice -- and, of course, that she had lived in Axelrod's apartment building at 505 North Lake Shore Drive, where, she admits, she knew the man The New York Times calls Obama's "hired muscle."

http://www.anncoulter.com/columns/2011-11-09.html

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

10 Nov 2011 15:25 #2 by Reverend Revelant

outdoor338 wrote: Herman Cain has spent his life living and working all over the country -- Indiana, Georgia, Minnesota, Nebraska, Kansas, Washington, D.C. -- but never in Chicago.

So it's curious that all the sexual harassment allegations against Cain emanate from Chicago: home of the Daley machine and Obama consigliere David Axelrod.

Suspicions had already fallen on Sheila O'Grady, who is close with David Axelrod and went straight from being former Chicago mayor Richard M. Daley's chief of staff to president of the Illinois Restaurant Association (IRA), as being the person who dug up Herman Cain's personnel records from the National Restaurant Association (NRA).

The Daley-controlled IRA works hand-in-glove with the NRA. And strangely enough, Cain's short, three-year tenure at the NRA is evidently the only period in his decades-long career during which he's alleged to have been a sexual predator.

After O'Grady's name surfaced in connection with the miraculous appearance of Cain's personnel files from the NRA, she issued a Clintonesque denial of any involvement in producing them -- by vigorously denying that she knew Cain when he was at the NRA. (Duh.)

And now, after a week of conservative eye-rolling over unspecified, anonymous accusations against Cain, we've suddenly got very specific sexual assault allegations from an all-new accuser out of ... Chicago.

Herman Cain has never lived in Chicago. But you know who has? David Axelrod! And guess who lived in Axelrod's very building? Right again: Cain's latest accuser, Sharon Bialek.

Bialek's accusations were certainly specific. But they also demonstrated why anonymous accusations are worthless.

Within 24 hours of Bialek's press conference, friends and acquaintances of hers stepped forward to say that she's a "gold-digger," that she was constantly in financial trouble -- having filed for personal bankruptcy twice -- and, of course, that she had lived in Axelrod's apartment building at 505 North Lake Shore Drive, where, she admits, she knew the man The New York Times calls Obama's "hired muscle."

http://www.anncoulter.com/columns/2011-11-09.html


Axelrod is a known PoS and I suspect Sharon Bialek is a bigger PoS. The left will do anything to bring a black man down.

Waiting for Armageddon since 33 AD

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

10 Nov 2011 15:34 - 11 Nov 2011 06:39 #3 by Photo-fish

The Liberals GOP Twin wrote: So it's curious that all the sexual harassment allegations against Cain emanate from Chicago


Not really. The National Restaurant Association has a few offices in Chicago and that is the city where they hold their annual convention. But if you would have done just a tiny bit of your OWN research, you would have found that out. No surprise there. Your latest topics have been full of poop and you never revisit them to admit your mistakes.

´¯`•.. ><((((º>`•´¯`•...¸><((((º> ´¯`•.. ><((((º>`´¯`•...¸><((((º>´¯`•.. ><((((º>`•´¯`•...¸><((((º> ´¯`•.. ><((((º>`•.´¯`•...¸><((((º>

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

10 Nov 2011 19:14 #4 by Wayne Harrison

The Liberals GOP Twin wrote: The left will do anything to bring a black man down.


I suspect it's not the left, since it's so early in the process and because Cain is not a threat, no matter how much you think he is. I think the Cain camp was right on when they accused Perry. He is the one with the most to gain from Cain stepping down.

I surprised no one here has blamed Perry's debate mind freeze on the liberals.

In case you've forgotten, it's the left that elected a black man President.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

10 Nov 2011 20:28 #5 by Blazer Bob

Conservation Voice wrote:

The Liberals GOP Twin wrote: The left will do anything to bring a black man down.


I suspect it's not the left, since it's so early in the process and because Cain is not a threat, no matter how much you think he is. .



I dissagree. here's proof. rofllol

http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=n ... +democrats

Over 24,000,000 hits.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

10 Nov 2011 20:41 #6 by Wayne Harrison
I only saw 8.5 million hits from that link but 9.6 million hits with:

"Cain is not a threat to Democrats"

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&safe ... l0.3.1l4l0

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

10 Nov 2011 20:44 #7 by Blazer Bob
Before I got 24.5, now 24mil even.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

10 Nov 2011 21:05 #8 by Wayne Harrison
Interesting. I wonder why we're getting different results..

Mine says "About 9,650,000 results (0.21 seconds)"

I think I just figured it out. I always have "Safe Search" on. When I take it off, I get 19 million.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

10 Nov 2011 21:53 #9 by Pony Soldier
"About 24,000,000 results (0.12 seconds)"

I don't like my results filtered.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

10 Nov 2011 21:55 #10 by Pony Soldier

Conservation Voice wrote: I only saw 8.5 million hits from that link but 9.6 million hits with:

"Cain is not a threat to Democrats"

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&safe ... l0.3.1l4l0



Hmm, same hits on the first page.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.161 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum
sponsors
© My Mountain Town (new)
Google+