The Liberals GOP Twin wrote: Sorry... I don't feel bad about these poor whiny-butt babies... you play, you pay... it's called law enforcement. Tough tittie.
So next time a group of tea baguettes decide to shout down a speaker at some town hall meeting they can expect to be treated likewise? :thumbsup:
If they've been told to get their rears off a piece of property, or told that they are breaking the law, or we find those tea baguettes creating an environment that attracts and supports rape, drug use, public drunkenness, filth and disease, property damage and murder... yep.. I would hope they they would be treated just like that.
Hang out with a bad crowd and chances are something bad is going to happen to you as well. I know this may come as a shock to you Wayne, but the right of the people peaceably to assemble doesn't include blocking intersections. Blocking intersections in violation of the law would, by definition, preclude that assembly from being defined as peaceable. It might be a non-violent assembly, but the 1st Amendment only protects the right of the people peaceably to assemble.
outdoor338 wrote: whatevergreen, show me where any tea party person, rapes someone, damages property of someone, throws trash everywhere, poops on police cars, stabs people, then we can talk....crickets chirping...birds singing..thought so...
Wrong topic idiot! Or terrible deflection moron! you take your pick. :bash
From the link you posted:
But the heckler was only able to get out a few words before Kevin Hiltunen of Brooklyn grabbed him by the scruff of his jacket and booted him out to the curb.
I am not talking about raping, trashing or causing property damage and all that. I am talking about 3 people going to a town hall meeting or public gathering and shouting down the speaker. That is what the original topic is about and that is what I commented on. You seem to think it is OK for the Tea Party folks to do this but not for anybody else or they get roughed up by a former jarhead.
So if I understand your supposed logic Whatevergreen, it is OK to deny others the exercise of their free speech in pursuit of that ideal on your own behalf? I don't think so. The ability to exercise your rights ends when it infringes on the rights of another. I'm sure you have heard the expression that the right to swing your fist ends at the tip of my nose, right? You are certainly allowed to exercise your own rights, but not at the expense of the rights of others.
Isn't it fortunate that the peaceably assembled crowd happened to have safety glasses, bandannas and milk? It is almost like they planned for trouble. :Whistle
whatevergreen writes: "So next time a group of tea baguettes decide to shout down a speaker at some town hall meeting they can expect to be treated likewise?"
Hey, skippy, I was comparing :Koolaid: OWS law breaking antics to peaceful tea party demostrations, (remember you're the one :Crying: who brought up the tea party :VeryScared: )...must be hard for a lib like you to understand law and order??? Keep spinning skippy..love to see that liberal spin :woo hoo: rofllol
It would be nice if you could just follow your own topic and distinguish what others are actually refering to instead of getting your defensive partisan panties in a bunch. I'll help you because you seem to be a twit.
1. You post a story about some guy getting thrown out of a public place for shouting over the speaker, an elected 'Republican' congressman. The throwee just happened to be a former Marine. (semper fi, Hoorah and all that follows).
2. I then make the point that if that is an acceptable way for a person who is JUST YELLING to be treated, then the same method would also be acceptable treatment for other groups (like Tea Partiers) that disrupt a speaker (let's say a Democrat for the sake of arguement), in a public venue.
3.I am NOT talking about the wacked out fringe idiots from OWS that are bent on violent disobedience. That is another topic altogether. I am strictly talking about this one person who was forcibly removed from a public space just for SPEAKING or shouting or yelling [Quote: "Only a few words"] before being forcibly removed.
4. So I will ask you this Outdoor: The next time a Tea Party member (or anyone for that matter) comes into a public venue (be it a dedication, swearing in ceremony, whaterver) is disruptive and shouts at or over the speaker, is it OK to treat them just like this fellow in Queens was treated?
Whatevergreen wrote: It would be nice if you could just follow your own topic and distinguish what others are actually refering to instead of getting your defensive partisan panties in a bunch. I'll help you because you seem to be a twit.
1. You post a story about some guy getting thrown out of a public place for shouting over the speaker, an elected 'Republican' congressman. The throwee just happened to be a former Marine. (semper fi, Hoorah and all that follows).
2. I then make the point that if that is an acceptable way for a person who is JUST YELLING to be treated, then the same method would also be acceptable treatment for other groups (like Tea Partiers) that disrupt a speaker (let's say a Democrat for the sake of arguement), in a public venue.
3.I am NOT talking about the wacked out fringe idiots from OWS that are bent on violent disobedience. That is another topic altogether. I am strictly talking about this one person who was forcibly removed from a public space just for SPEAKING or shouting or yelling [Quote: "Only a few words"] before being forcibly removed.
4. So I will ask you this Outdoor: The next time a Tea Party member (or anyone for that matter) comes into a public venue (be it a dedication, swearing in ceremony, whaterver) is disruptive and shouts at or over the speaker, is it OK to treat them just like this fellow in Queens was treated?
whatevergreen, show me where any tea party person, rapes someone, damages property of someone, throws trash everywhere, poops on police cars, stabs people, then we can talk....crickets chirping...birds singing..thought so...
rofllol 
