Martin Ent Inc wrote: I was under the thought, that most of the jobs created in Texas were government jobs?
Read this for the facts on the jobs in Texas. And it is by a guy who doesn't like Perry. But the facts are undeniable. It dispells all the MSM myths that people fall for.
So by your argument, it would be a terrible mistake to implement all these "too good" policies in every state because they would then all be flooded by illegal aliens and poverty would increase.
Or, if one uses logic instead of partisanship as the basis for their premise, if all of the states implemented Texas type policies, there would be no great migration into one state by people hoping to find work and artificially driving up its poverty statistics when the success of one state proves insufficient to make up for the failures of so many other states.
AspenValley wrote: So by your argument, it would be a terrible mistake to implement all these "too good" policies in every state because they would then all be flooded by illegal aliens and poverty would increase.
NO. The border will be closed the quickest by Perry so that will be a non issue. What I am saying is that the policies implimented in Texas that took Americans and businesses from all the other failed policy states and brought back companies from overseas should be in ALL the states then people could prosper under that everywhere and not have to move to overwelm one state. Then the prosperity would be divided more equally.
PrintSmith wrote: Or, if one uses logic instead of partisanship as the basis for their premise, if all of the states implemented Texas type policies, there would be no great migration into one state by people hoping to find work and artificially driving up its poverty statistics when the success of one state proves insufficient to make up for the failures of so many other states.
Couldn't have said it any better. Should have read this one before I posted my last post! I need to borrow that one!
The Draft Herman Cain PAC, which is raising funds to support the presidential bid of Herman Cain, has given up on the one-time frontrunner and changed its name to Beat Obama PAC.
The move comes as no surprise to those following the group. A Washington Times report found that it is run by two men, Charles Benninghoff and Randy Goodwin, with a history of creating political committees that raise money through mailings and spending little on actual politics. Their goal is to choose a hot topic, personality, or target to raise money off of and then funnel that money into a series of organizations they control.
Part of the success of these groups comes from the purchasing of "sucker" donor lists. Donors to Draft Herman Cain PAC are often contributors to a series of other ineffective, Tea Party-tinged political organizations that still seem to raise huge sums of money. As the Washington Times reported, "the pattern indicates the presence of valuable “sucker lists” containing broad swaths of tea party donors, many of whom eschew the party establishment and are new to politics, who will respond to generic attacks on liberals without careful scrutiny of where their money is going. Those lists then are rented at great expense."
