Why is the incumbent not challenged within his party?

30 Nov 2011 12:32 #1 by The Boss
I am trying through either logic or history to understand what about the primary in 2008 made it so the President is the best candidate to run for Democrats in 2012. 2008 was quite a while ago and does not speak to today's issues or give even the party in power the right to speak up about current performance.

Wouldn't we all benefit if he was challenged in his own party?

P.S. I would say this for either party.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

30 Nov 2011 12:46 #2 by Nobody that matters

posteryoyo wrote: I am trying through either logic or history to understand what about the primary in 2008 made it so the President is the best candidate to run for Democrats in 2012. 2008 was quite a while ago and does not speak to today's issues or give even the party in power the right to speak up about current performance.

Wouldn't we all benefit if he was challenged in his own party?

P.S. I would say this for either party.


There's nothing that says the incumbent can't be challenged in a primary - it just doesn't happen much. If Obama's ratings are low enough by the primaries, there's no reason that a challenger couldn't announce. Although, I think without the Party's chief high mucky-mucks blessings it'd be political suicide. The challenger would have to have huge grass roots support, name recognition, and previously untarnished popularity.

"Whatever you are, be a good one." ~ Abraham Lincoln

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

30 Nov 2011 13:00 #3 by The Boss
Thanks. That seems pretty logical.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

30 Nov 2011 13:55 #4 by FredHayek
President Ford was challenged by Reagan in '76. Did any Dem challenge Carter in 1980?
I don't think Bush was seriously challenged by a (R) in 2004. Nor Clinton in 1996.

Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

30 Nov 2011 14:05 #5 by chickaree
I'm sure the party has no wish to spend it's war chest in a costly primary. Challengers are likely firmly discouraged.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

30 Nov 2011 16:25 #6 by Rick
Democrats would have to admit they make a mistake...just not possible.

The left is angry because they are now being judged by the content of their character and not by the color of their skin.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

30 Nov 2011 16:33 #7 by Kate

FredHayek wrote: President Ford was challenged by Reagan in '76. Did any Dem challenge Carter in 1980?
I don't think Bush was seriously challenged by a (R) in 2004. Nor Clinton in 1996.

Kennedy challenged Carter in 1980.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

30 Nov 2011 16:46 #8 by bailey bud
WSJ was hoping Hillary would challenge President Obama - but doubt it will happen.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

30 Nov 2011 16:58 #9 by chickaree
I can't figure out why some conservatives have fallen in love with "it takes a village" Hillary lately.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

30 Nov 2011 17:03 #10 by Kate

chickaree wrote: I can't figure out why some conservatives have fallen in love with "it takes a village" Hillary lately.

They are hoping for an internal struggle within the Democratic Party, thus damaging President Obama.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.144 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum
sponsors
© My Mountain Town (new)
Google+